453-Day Delay Condoned: ITAT Gives Haryana Government School Another Chance to Contest Section 234E Demand:
ITAT condones a 453-day delay by a Haryana government school, sets aside the ex parte CIT(A) order, and directs a fresh hearing on the Section 234E demand.
ITAT Sets Aside CIT(A)'s Ex Parte Order
Saloni Kumari
Aug 27, 2026
Premium
453-Day Delay Condoned: ITAT Gives Haryana Government School Another Chance to Contest Section 234E Demand
ITAT condones a 453-day delay by a Haryana government school, sets aside the ex parte CIT(A) order, and directs a fresh hearing on the Section 234E demand.
Also Read
Supreme Court Upholds Customs Commissioner’s Power to Notify Port Trust as Custodian for Pilfered GoodsITAT Deletes Rs 34.79 Lakh Unexplained Cash Deposit Addition After Same Deposits Taxed in Father’s HandsITAT Remits Section 69A Additions to AO for Fresh Adjudication ITAT Sets Aside Ex-Parte Assessment After Finding Errors and Lack of Application of Mind in CIT(A) Order
About Author
Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2651My Recent Articles
- ITAT Deletes Rs 34.79 Lakh Unexplained Cash Deposit Addition After Same Deposits Taxed in Father’s HandsPremium
- Gujarat HC Quashes Rs 15.76 Crore GST Penalty After Noting Section 122(1A) Penalty Was Never Proposed in SCNPremium
- ITAT Mumbai Rules in Reliance Jio’s Favour on Rs 11,003 Crore Expenses and Rs 66.65 Crore TDS DisputePremium
- Mahindra Holidays Receives GST SCN With Rs 11.33 Crore Tax Demand Over Short Payment of Tax in Uttarakhand
- PAN Misuse Sparks Rs 1.63 Crore GST Demand: Fake ‘Classic Enterprises’ Firm Triggers Police Case In Bhadohi
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts