Allahabad HC Quashes GST Penalty; Officer Ordered Three Months' Training for Ignorance of GST Provisions:

Allahabad High Court quashes GST penalty, orders proper notice to be issued and remands the case to officer for fresh consideration.
HC Sets Aside GST Penalty, Directs Fresh Notice and Officer Training

Allahabad HC Quashes GST Penalty; Officer Ordered Three Months' Training for Ignorance of GST Provisions
M/S MLV Constructions (petitioner) approached the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court, comprising Justice Sangeeta Chandra and Justice Brij Raj Singh, challenging a GST order. The High Court quashed the GST penalty order. It noted that the SGST Assistant Commissioner, Ramesh Kumar, was unable to read or explain the provisions of the GST Act in court, even though he had earlier issued a penalty order against the company.
The case started when the company, M/S MLV Constructions, transported its machinery from Rajasthan to Bihar. The company possessed a valid e-way bill for legal transportation, which was scheduled to expire on June 19, 2025. The department confiscated the vehicle on June 21, 2025, in Lucknow.
Thereafter, the tax department imposed a penalty after sending notices only to the driver and transporter, instead of issuing them to the actual sender or receiver of the goods, as required under Section 129(1)(a) of the CGST Act.
The company found this penalty order to be unfair and in contravention of Section 129(3), which says a proper opportunity to be heard should be given before the issuance of a final order. Considering this, the Allahabad High Court quashed the GST penalty order and remanded the case to the department for fresh consideration and issued a proper show cause notice (SCN) to the company via registered post, SMS, and email, and thereafter issued the final order considering the speakings of company.
Also, the court scolded the officer for not being properly aware of the GST rules and ordered him to attend three months of training.
Citation: M/S MLV Constructions Vs. State of U.P.; Writ Tax No. 752 of 2025; 21/08/2025; Allahabad High Court
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2752My Recent Articles
- ICSI Urges MCA to Introduce a Dedicated E-Form for Intimation of Secretarial Auditor Appointment and Resignation
- ICSI Invites Professional Feedback on MCA21-V3 Portal Issues to Improve Form Filing Process; Deadline Sept 15
- ICSI Urges MCA to Fix E-Sahaj Portal Registration Glitches Affecting Mandatory Security Clearances
- ITAT Remands Section 201(1A) Interest Dispute for Fresh Verification Over Duplication/Overlap ClaimPremium
- ITAT Holds Section 270A Penalty Invalid Without Stating Misreporting DefaultPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








