Allahabad HC Quashes GST Penalty; Officer Ordered Three Months' Training for Ignorance of GST Provisions:

Allahabad High Court quashes GST penalty, orders proper notice to be issued and remands the case to officer for fresh consideration.
HC Sets Aside GST Penalty, Directs Fresh Notice and Officer Training

Allahabad HC Quashes GST Penalty; Officer Ordered Three Months' Training for Ignorance of GST Provisions
M/S MLV Constructions (petitioner) approached the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court, comprising Justice Sangeeta Chandra and Justice Brij Raj Singh, challenging a GST order. The High Court quashed the GST penalty order. It noted that the SGST Assistant Commissioner, Ramesh Kumar, was unable to read or explain the provisions of the GST Act in court, even though he had earlier issued a penalty order against the company.
The case started when the company, M/S MLV Constructions, transported its machinery from Rajasthan to Bihar. The company possessed a valid e-way bill for legal transportation, which was scheduled to expire on June 19, 2025. The department confiscated the vehicle on June 21, 2025, in Lucknow.
Thereafter, the tax department imposed a penalty after sending notices only to the driver and transporter, instead of issuing them to the actual sender or receiver of the goods, as required under Section 129(1)(a) of the CGST Act.
The company found this penalty order to be unfair and in contravention of Section 129(3), which says a proper opportunity to be heard should be given before the issuance of a final order. Considering this, the Allahabad High Court quashed the GST penalty order and remanded the case to the department for fresh consideration and issued a proper show cause notice (SCN) to the company via registered post, SMS, and email, and thereafter issued the final order considering the speakings of company.
Also, the court scolded the officer for not being properly aware of the GST rules and ordered him to attend three months of training.
Citation: M/S MLV Constructions Vs. State of U.P.; Writ Tax No. 752 of 2025; 21/08/2025; Allahabad High Court
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2493My Recent Articles
- Principle of Natural Justice Prevails: ITAT Remands Case for Fresh Assessment After Finding Assessment Was Completed Ex PartePremium
- ITAT Invalidates Entire Assessment Proceedings Over Failure to Issue Mandatory Section 143(2) Notice Within Prescribed Time LimitedPremium
- ITAT Holds CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Taxpayer’s Appeal Merely Over Non-Prosecution Without Merit HearingPremium
- ITAT Remands TDS Appeal After CIT(A) Failed to Decide Actual CAM Charges IssuePremium
- ITAT Rules in Taxpayer's Favour, Holds Delay in Filing Form 67 Cannot Be Sole Ground to Deny Foreign Tax CreditPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








