Big Win! HC Allows SVLDRS Claim for Pre-June 2019 Dues:

Director’s admission and investigation record held sufficient for quantification under Section 2(r), SVLDRS
High Court finds recorded liability satisfies quantification requirement under SVLDRS

Big Win! HC Allows SVLDRS Claim for Pre-June 2019 Dues
The petitioner applied to the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS), declaring a quantified service tax liability of Rs. 1.21 crore based on a statement recorded during a summons on 4 January 2019. The application was rejected on the ground that tax dues were not “quantified” as on 30 June 2019, as per a DGGI communication dated 3 February 2020. The petitioner challenged this rejection, arguing that the quantification requirement under Section 2(r) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019, was satisfied and that CBIC Circular dated 27 August 2019 and FAQs dated 24 December 2019 supported their claim. The petitioner also contended that the rejection failed to consider the departmental materials, including the recorded admission of tax dues and the reduced final liability assessed later at Rs. 1.16 crore.
Issue raised: Whether the petitioner’s declaration under SVLDRS could be rejected on the ground that tax dues were not quantified as on 30 June 2019, despite earlier admissions of liability during investigation and clarifications in CBIC Circulars and FAQs.
HC's Decision: According to the Hon'ble High Court, the petitioner was eligible under the SVLDRS. The court noted that tax dues had been quantified before 30 June 2019 through the director’s recorded statement and investigation proceedings. It ruled that this quantification met the requirement under Section 2(r), as clarified by the CBIC Circular dated 27 August 2019 and FAQs dated 24 December 2019. As a result, the rejection was quashed, and the matter was sent back for a fresh calculation of the dues. The court directed that if the petitioner pays the revised amount, including 6% simple interest from 1 February 2020, the show cause notice will be quashed.
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








