CBIC Confirms Retrospective Applicability of Rule 96(10) Omission Effective from October 23, 2017:

CBIC Confirms Retrospective Applicability of Rule 96(10) Omission Effective from October 23, 2017

CBIC clarifies that the omission of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, 2017, applies retrospectively from October 23, 2017, following the Supreme Court's judgment.

CBIC Issues Clarification on Rule 96(10) Omission and Pending GST Proceedings

authorSaloni KumaridateOct 28, 2026
Last update on Oct 27, 2026

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) under the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) has released a clarification in relation to the omission of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, vide a Circular No. 264/10/2026-GST, dated October 26, 2026, in exercise of its powers granted under sub-section (1) of section 168 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

At the start of the present circular, the Board drew attention to the judgements passed by several distinct courts in relation to the issue of retrospective applicability of the omission of rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, from October 23, 2017.

CBIC Clarifies Seven Key Issues Concerning Input Service Distributor (ISD) Under CGST Act and Rules 2017

Several taxpayers and tax officials were confused about whether the retrospective applicability of the omission of sub-rule (10) of Rule 96 of the CGST Rules, announced vide Notification No. 20/2024-Central Tax, dated October 08, 2024, is truly applicable from October 23, 2017, as cited by multiple courts in their judgements.

Considering the same confusion, the CBIC, relying on the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court announced on August 06, 2026, in a case titled M/s Goodluck India Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., has officially clarified that the omission of rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules is applicable retrospectively from October 23, 2017.

CBIC Clarifies GST Pre-Deposit Refund Procedure in Appeals Under Sections 107 and 112, Addresses Six Key Questions

"Accordingly, the field formations are advised to deal with pending proceedings concerning rule 96(10) in accordance with the said judgment. It may also be noted that such a treatment shall apply, mutatis mutandis, in respect of omission of rules 89(4A) and 89(4B) as well," the circular clarifies.

For complete clarification, refer to the official circular.

About Author

LinkedIn

Saloni Kumari

Content Writer

Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2974
Up Next

Loading suggestions…