Court Quashes Service Tax Demand Raised Solely on Income Tax Data Without Hearing the Assessee:

Somil Kumar Mittal was issued a service tax demand for 2015–16 based solely on income tax records and Form 26AS, without any independent inquiry. The order was passed ex-parte, denying him an opportunity to present his case and claim exemption.
No Tax Without Due Process

Whether service tax can be demanded solely based on Form 26AS and income tax data without an independent inquiry and a fair hearing.
Facts of the Case
Somil Kumar Mittal took the Union of India and the Bengaluru Tax Office to court. The tax office had ordered him to pay service tax for 2015-16 based only on his old income tax records and Form 26AS.
Somil was upset because the decision was made without him being there to defend himself (ex parte). He believes that if he is given a fair chance to speak, he can prove he shouldn't have to pay the tax at all because he is exempt.
Issue Involved In This Case
Whether the tax authorities legally demand service tax based solely on information from income tax returns and Form-26AS, without conducting an independent investigation or giving the taxpayer a fair chance to prove they were exempt from payment?
Decision Of The Court
The Court directed the tax authorities to re-examine the case with a focus on whether the petitioner’s activities legally qualify as a "service", if they fall under the "negative list, or if they are covered by specific tax exemptions.
The authorities must also determine if the demand is barred by the statute of limitations. Following the quashing of the original order, the Court ordered that all previous instructions sent to the petitioner's bank be rescinded immediately.
Finally, the petitioner was directed to appear before the Commissioner of Central Tax on May 18, 2026, to proceed with the matter.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2420My Recent Articles
- Bona Fide Mistake in ITR Cannot Deny Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS Compensation, Holds ITATPremium
- ITAT Grants Taxpayer a Final Opportunity to Explain Rs 2.27 Crore Cash Deposits Under Section 69APremium
- ITAT Restores Appeals for Fresh Consideration After NFAC Denied Request of Personal Hearing Through Video ConferencingPremium
- ITAT Condones 97-Day Delay, Restores Appeal After CIT(A) Sent Hearing Notices to Wrong Email AddressPremium
- MCA Appoints Justice (Retd.) Yogesh Khanna as Officiating Chairperson of NCLAT for Three Months
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts









