GST Credit Blocked? Not Without pre-decisional hearing Rules Supreme Court!:

As per Apex Court GST Rule 86A requires independent evaluation and pre-decisional hearing before restricting the Input Tax Credit
Supreme Court endorses procedural safeguards; Rejects delayed SLP

GST Credit Blocked? Not Without pre-decisional hearing Rules Supreme Court!
The petitioners, GST-registered businesses dealing in metals and scrap, had their Electronic Credit Ledgers (ECLs) blocked on June 27, 2023, by the GST authorities under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules, citing alleged fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) based on investigation reports. The orders were passed without prior notice or independent application of mind. The Single Judge of the HC dismissed the writ petitions filed before it by the petitioner, challenging the blocking, on 27 July 2023. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner filed intra-court appeals before the Division Bench of the same High Court. Issue Raised: Is it legally permissible to invoke Rule 86A and block ECL entries without conducting a pre-decisional hearing and establishing independent satisfaction? HC's Decision: The division bench of the High Court allowed the appeals, holding that Rule 86A is an extreme power that can only be used after the officer in question has been independently and objectively satisfied, based on concrete evidence. The Court underlined that, because of the grave civil ramifications involved, the principles of natural justice must be read into Rule 86A even in the absence of an explicit requirement. It concluded that the orders were mechanical, ambiguous, and based on borrowed satisfaction. As a result, the ECL blocking orders were lifted. SC's Decision: The State filed an SLP challenging the HC's decision before the Apex Court, which was dismissed by the Supreme Court, noting a delay of 243 days and no sufficient cause shown. The Court, even while deciding the matter on merits, found no ground to interfere, thereby upholding the High Court's ruling. The Supreme Court's ruling essentially supports the need for fair procedures and a well-reasoned judgment when applying Rule 86A. Click on the Link given below to Download the judgment of High Court and Supreme Court in this matter.About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…










