GST: Madras HC Quashes Order Passed Without Giving Chance to Be Heard:

The Madras High Court condoned the delay as the GST notices were uploaded on the portal online, and no physical copies were issued to the petitioner.
Madras HC Condones Delay in Filing Appeal Against Order
Table of Contents

GST: Madras HC Quashes Order Passed Without Giving Chance to Be Heard
The petitioner received a show cause notice, which he failed to reply to, and the tax officer passed a final order to the petitioner. The petitioner filed 2 writ petitions challenging the assessment orders dated 03.09.2024 issued by the State Tax Officer for the financial years 2020-21 and 2021-22.
Petitioner's Arguments
The learned counsel of the Petitioner submitted that the show cause notices (SCN) were uploaded on the GST portal on 05.05.2024 and not in physical form. Due to this, the petitioner was not aware of the SCN and could not submit the response. This resulted in the state officer passing final orders dated 03.09.2024. The learned council further submitted that even the final orders were issued on the GST portal in "view additional notices column". Additionally, the petitioner filed appeals before the First Appellate Authority, the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, by depositing 10% of the disputed tax amount. However, the appeals were rejected because they were filed late.Madras High Court Decision
The Madras High Court observed that the GST notices were uploaded on the portal online, and no physical copies were issued to the petitioner. Because of this, the petitioner was unaware of the show-cause notice and failed to respond. It further notes that even the final orders were uploaded on the GST portal, due to which the petitioner could not reply on time. Therefore, the court ruled in favour of the petitioner and condoned the delay in filing the appeals against the final order dated 03.09.2024. The court gave the following instructions:- The Appellate Authority is ordered to accept the appeals if the petitioner pays 15% of the disputed tax in addition to the 10% statutory predeposit (total 25% of the disputed tax amount).
- The petitioner must submit their reply along with supporting documents to the Appellate Authority.
- The Appellate Authority must then hear the petitioner's side and pass a fresh order after hearing the petitioner.
About Author

Nidhi
Content Writer
Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1833My Recent Articles
- Karnataka High Court Gives Another Chance in GST Matter Due to Lack of Hearing
- Delay Should Be Condoned if Explanation is Unrefuted: ITAT
- Non-Service of Income Tax Notice, Ill health of taxpayer, ITAT condones Appeal filing delay
- Books of Accounts Cannot be Rejected Without Any Specific Defect: ITAT Kolkata
- Karnataka High Court Sends ITC Matter Back to GST Authorities for Reconsideration
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








