GSTAT: Distributor Profiteered Rs. 3.31 Lakh by Increasing Base Price Post-GST Cut:

GSTAT confirms anti-profiteering finding against Assessee Company for failing to pass on the 28% to 18% GST rate benefit, directing deposit of Rs. 3,31,879/- plus 18% interest into CWF.
GSTAT directs company to deposit Rs. 3.31 Lacs into the Consumer Welfare Fund with 18% interest for not passing on the GST rate reduction benefit to consumers

GSTAT: Distributor Profiteered Rs. 3.31 Lakh by Increasing Base Price Post-GST Cut
The Respondent, a distributor of M/s. L'Oréal India Pvt. Ltd. was subjected to anti-profiteering proceedings under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act). The investigation stemmed from the reduction in the rate of GST on Cosmetics Products from 28% to 18% with effect from November 15, 2017, via Notification No. 41/2017. The erstwhile National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) had already passed Order No. 25/2018 on December 27, 2018, determining an amount of Rs. 3,43,109/- as profiteered for the period 15.11.2017 to 31.03.2018, which the Respondent accepted and deposited.
The current investigation, initiated following a direction from the erstwhile NAA, covered the subsequent period from April 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. The Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) reported that the Respondent failed to pass on the benefit to consumers by increasing the base price of the products, which resulted in the cum-tax price remaining unchanged despite the tax rate reduction.
Main Issue: Whether the Respondent profited an amount of Rs. 3,31,879/- by not passing the benefit of the reduction in the Rate of GST (from 28% to 18% w.e.f. 15.11.2017) to consumers for the period 01.04.2018 to 31.12.2018.
Tribunal's Decision: The Goods and Service Tax Appellate Authority (GSTAT), Principal Bench, confirmed the order under appeal. The Authority noted that there was no dispute that the GST rate was reduced and that the unit sale prices of various products remained unchanged. It was established that the GST rate of 18% was charged on an increased base price, which meant the cum-tax price paid by consumers was not reduced commensurately.
Therefore, the GSTAT directed the Respondent to deposit a sum of Rs. 3,31,879/- along with interest of 18% P.A. from the date of collection of the higher amount (01.04.2018 to 31.12.2018) into the Consumer Welfare Fund (CWF) created by the Centre and State under the CGST Act, within a period of three months.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2158My Recent Articles
- ITAT Quashes Consequential Assessment After Section 263 Revision Order FailsPremium
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








