HC Allows Deduction of Penal Rent from Gratuity for Unauthorised Retention of Company Quarter:

The Calcutta High Court rules that gratuity can be adjusted against penal rent for unauthorised occupation of company quarters after retirement.
HC permits deduction of penal rent from gratuity for unauthorized quarter retention

HC Allows Deduction of Penal Rent from Gratuity for Unauthorised Retention of Company Quarter
The dispute arose after an employee of Eastern Coalfields Limited retired in June 2022 but continued to occupy the company-allotted residential quarter without vacating it. As per company policy and circulars issued by Coal India Limited, employees were required to vacate quarters upon retirement, failing which, penal rent would be charged and adjusted against retirement dues, including gratuity.
Since the employer withheld gratuity on this ground, the matter reached the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which directed payment of gratuity amounting to Rs 18.99 lakh. This order was upheld by the Appellate Authority. Aggrieved, the employer approached the High Court challenging both orders.
Main Issue: Whether an employer can withhold or adjust gratuity towards penal rent and dues arising from unauthorised occupation of company accommodation after retirement.
HC's Order: The High Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority. It held that dues arising from unauthorised occupation of company accommodation, including penal rent, qualify as recoverable dues and can be adjusted against gratuity.
The Court observed that while gratuity is a statutory right, it is not immune from lawful deductions where the employee is liable for dues. The continued unauthorised occupation justified recovery through adjustment of retirement benefits.
The Court directed that the deposited gratuity amount be returned to the employer, who is entitled to deduct rent and penal charges. The balance amount, if any, must be paid to the employee within 15 days of vacating the accommodation.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2189My Recent Articles
- ITAT Holds Section 263 Assessment Cannot Survive After Revision Order Is QuashedPremium
- ITAT Allows Section 80P Deduction on Interest From Co-operative BanksPremium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition on Marriage Gift and Household Cash ExplanationPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs.1.36 Crore Section 69A Addition Against Customs House AgentPremium
- ITAT Remands Charitable Trust Taxation Dispute Despite Denial of Section 12A RegistrationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








