HC Grants Relief in High-Profile Counterfeit Drug Case:

Twin conditions satisfied; accused granted bail in a counterfeit drug money laundering case.
Right to speedy trial under Article 21 emphasized.

HC Grants Relief in High-Profile Counterfeit Drug Case
The case emanated from a sensational ED investigation into an alleged multimillion rupee scam relating to the production and marketing of spurious life-saving chemotherapeutic agents such as Keytruda and Opdyta. The proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) had been commenced in light of a predicate FIR containing charges of cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy, among others.
Various accused persons, namely, Pravez Khan, Neeraj Chauhan, and Gajendra Singh, among others, had been arrested for the purposes of investigating their possible involvement in the supply, finance, and overall administration of the syndicate. The accused sought regular bail on the grounds of their noninvolvement in money laundering and a long period of incarceration without any imminent completion of the proceedings.
Issue Before Court: Whether the accused satisfies Section 45 PMLA twin conditions for bail in a counterfeit drug-linked money laundering case?
HC Decided: Regular bail has been granted to all the petitioners on the ground that both the conditions mentioned in Section 45 of PMLA have been met in this case. According to the Court, the ED has been unable to prove a link between the alleged proceeds of crime and the relevant financial transactions by the accused persons. Moreover, some of the accused persons played only a peripheral role as either an employee or any other facilitator and did not control the operation itself.
In view of the right to speedy trial under Article 21, it is unlawful to keep a person in jail unnecessarily where there is no prospect of trial in the immediate future. With regard to statutory requirements, the court opined that there were sufficient reasons to believe that the accused persons were not likely to commit any offence, as they may not even commit the offence of money laundering in the instant case.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below.
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








