HC: Notice Under 148A(b) Cannot Demand Information; Such Enquiry Falls Under 148A(a):

HC: Notice Under 148A(b) Cannot Demand Information; Such Enquiry Falls Under 148A(a)

Court holds that AO cannot seek information or conduct enquiry under the guise of a Section 148A(b) notice; such notice is invalid and liable to be set aside

High Court Quashes Section 148A(b) Notice Issued for Verification Instead of Providing a Show-Cause Opportunity

authorMeetu KumaridateNov 25, 2025
Last update on Nov 25, 2025
HC: Notice Under 148A(b) Cannot Demand Information; Such Enquiry Falls Under 148A(a) The petitioner challenged notices dated 23.03.2022 and 31.03.2022 issued under Sections 148 and 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, along with the later order dated 31.03.2022 passed under Section 148A(d). The Assessing Officer (AO) sought details regarding cash purchase transactions with M/s Sangini Corporation and M/s Nandkishor Corporation for the financial year 2017-18, calling for ledgers and explanations of amounts totalling around Rs. 1.37 crore.
Gujarat HC Gives 82-Year-Old Woman Relief in Missed Tax Return Case
Main Issue: Whether a notice issued under Section 148A(b) can lawfully require the assessee to furnish information for verification, effectively amounting to an enquiry under Section 148A(a).
Agreement to sell and sale consideration cannot be doubted for merely non-registration of sale deed: ITAT
HC's Order: The Gujarat High Court set aside the notices and the consequential order, holding Section 148A(b) provides an opportunity of being heard after the AO has already conducted enquiry under Section 148A(a). A notice under Section 148A(b) cannot seek information or act as a questionnaire meant for conducting an enquiry. The AO’s act of asking for ledgers and transaction details shows that the notice was, in substance, an enquiry under Section 148A(a), not a show-cause notice under Section 148A(b). Therefore, the notice and the order under Section 148A(d) were procedurally defective and invalid from inception. These defects go to the root and warrant the entire proceedings being quashed. The Court held that the Revenue is free to re-initiate proceedings under law, consistent with statutory timelines. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2166
Up Next

Loading suggestions…