High Court Pulls Up ITAT Over Repeated Non-Compliance With Rule 34; Directs to Pronounce Orders Within 90 Days:
The Bombay High Court has directed all ITAT benches to strictly comply with Rule 34 by pronouncing reserved orders within the prescribed 90-day limit.
HC Sets August 13 Deadline in Pending Appeal
Saloni Kumari
Aug 5, 2026
Premium
High Court Pulls Up ITAT Over Repeated Non-Compliance With Rule 34; Directs to Pronounce Orders Within 90 Days
The Bombay High Court has directed all ITAT benches to strictly comply with Rule 34 by pronouncing reserved orders within the prescribed 90-day limit.
Also Read
ITAT Deletes Rs 1.66 Crore Addition Based on Uncorroborated Third-Party Loose SheetsITAT Allows Section 80G Deduction on CSR Donations to Eligible Charitable EntitiesITAT Sends Rs 1.26 Crore Income Tax Dispute Back to Assessing Officer After Taxpayer Seeks Fresh Opportunity to Submit EvidenceITAT Remands Dispute of Addition Solely Based on Third-Party Statement and Without Establishing Any Nexus for Fresh Adjudication
About Author
Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2641My Recent Articles
- ITAT Remands Dispute of Addition Solely Based on Third-Party Statement and Without Establishing Any Nexus for Fresh AdjudicationPremium
- GST Authorities Propose Rs 15.41 Crore Demand Against Nuvoco Vistas’ Subsidiary Over ITC, Credit Notes
- Tata Steel Limited Secures Relief Rs 1,755.10 Crore GST Demand Raised Over Alleged Excess Coal Extraction
- Indian Railway Finance Corporation Faces Rs 549 Crore GST Demand Over Alleged Excess ITC Availment for FY 2022-23
- Section 23(5) Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Unsold Flats: ITAT Deletes Rs 31.56 Lakh Deemed Rent AdditionPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts