High Court Pulls Up ITAT Over Repeated Non-Compliance With Rule 34; Directs to Pronounce Orders Within 90 Days:
The Bombay High Court has directed all ITAT benches to strictly comply with Rule 34 by pronouncing reserved orders within the prescribed 90-day limit.
HC Sets August 13 Deadline in Pending Appeal
Saloni Kumari
Aug 5, 2026
Premium
High Court Pulls Up ITAT Over Repeated Non-Compliance With Rule 34; Directs to Pronounce Orders Within 90 Days
The Bombay High Court has directed all ITAT benches to strictly comply with Rule 34 by pronouncing reserved orders within the prescribed 90-day limit.
Also Read
ITAT Deletes Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) on Estimated IncomeITAT Sets Aside CIT(A)'s Ex Parte Order in Rs 1.78 Crore Bogus Derivative Loss Dispute After Finding Need for Fresh HearingITAT Deletes Rs 4.42 Lakh Penalty, Says PF and ESI Disallowance Does Not Amount to MisreportingSupreme Court Holds Section 43B Disallowance Impermissible Without Claim of Deduction
About Author
Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2994My Recent Articles
- Petronet LNG Moves Gujarat High Court Challenging Rs 283.72 Crore GST Show Cause Notice on Use or Pay Charges
- ITAT Sets Aside CIT(A)'s Ex Parte Order in Rs 1.78 Crore Bogus Derivative Loss Dispute After Finding Need for Fresh Hearing
- Rajshree Sugars Gets Major Relief as Commissioner Drops Rs 6,283.59 Lakh Central Excise Demand
- ITAT Deletes Rs 4.42 Lakh Penalty, Says PF and ESI Disallowance Does Not Amount to Misreporting
- ITAT Remands Tax Matter to AO After Finding Natural Justice Violation and CIT(A)'s Failure to Examine Appeal on Merits
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts