High Court Quashes GST Order, GST SCN via Portal Alone Insufficient:

High Court Quashes GST Order, GST SCN via Portal Alone Insufficient

HC Quashes Ex Parte GST Order Passed Solely on Portal-Uploaded Show Cause Notice

Uploading SCN Not Enough: Court Orders Use of Section 169(1) Service Modes

authorMeetu KumaridateJul 29, 2025
Last update on Jul 29, 2025
High Court Quashes GST Order; GST SCN via Portal Alone Insufficient The petitioner, a proprietorship firm, challenged an assessment order dated 16.04.2024 issued by the State Tax Officer under Section 73 of the TNGST/CGST Act, 2017, for the year 2018-19. The grievance was that the show cause notice (SCN) was only uploaded on the GST portal, and no physical copy or other mode of service was used. The petitioner’s GST consultant failed to inform him about the uploaded notice, and the assessment order was passed ex parte without any personal hearing. The petitioner sought the quashing of the order, citing a violation of principles of natural justice.
ITAT Quashes Penalty Under Section 270A on Leave Encashment Claim
Issue Raised: If the GST assessment order that was issued based only on SCNs uploaded to the GST portal, without guaranteeing efficient service or providing a face-to-face hearing, is legally valid.
Madras HC Restores Cancelled GST Registration on Cost and Strict Compliance Conditions
HC's Ruling: The High Court ruled that while uploading a show cause notice (SCN) on the GST portal is legally valid, it cannot be the sole method of service when the taxpayer shows no response. The Court stressed that officers must use other modes under Section 169(1) of the CGST Act, like RPAD, to ensure the notice is effectively served. Passing ex parte orders after merely uploading notices, the Court observed, amounts to “empty formalities,” violates natural justice, and clogs the judicial system with unnecessary cases.

In this case, the Court set aside the order and sent the matter back for fresh consideration. It directed the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks, file a reply with documents in the next two weeks, and be given a clear 14-day notice for a personal hearing. The officer was ordered to pass a fresh order in accordance with law, and the writ petition was disposed of with these directions, closing the connected miscellaneous petitions.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…