High Court Rejects Bail to Accused Collecting Rs 2.44 Crore By Misrepresenting As A CA:
The Gauhati High Court Finds Incriminating Material and Notes Investigation Is Yet to Be Completed
Accused Collected Money for GST, PF and ESIC Dues
Saima
Aug 14, 2026
Premium
High Court Rejects Bail to Accused Collecting Rs 2.44 Crore By Misrepresenting As A CA
The Gauhati High Court Finds Incriminating Material and Notes Investigation Is Yet to Be Completed
Also Read
High Court Holds Section 61 Scrutiny Not Mandatory Before Issuing Section 74A GST NoticeHigh Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to GST Purchasers Accused of Availing Bogus ITCCrompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Faces Rs 8.37 Lakh GST Interest Demand Over Delayed GSTR-3B FilingSudarshan Colorants Rs 5.11 Cr GST Appeal Rejected by Tamil Nadu Authority
About Author
Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
422My Recent Articles
- ITAT Ahmedabad Allows Partner Remuneration Deduction Under Section 40(b) Premium
- ITAT Holds Offshore Supplies by Italian Company Not Taxable in India Premium
- ITAT Holds FDR-Bank Balance Difference Cannot Alone Be Treated as Unexplained IncomePremium
- High Court Holds Section 61 Scrutiny Not Mandatory Before Issuing Section 74A GST NoticePremium
- ITAT Rules Advisory Fee Directly Linked to Share Divestment Qualifies as Deductible Transfer ExpenditurePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts