High Court Says Entire Bank Account Cannot Be Frozen During Investigation Without Justification:

HC held that freezing a bank account without specifying disputed amount or nexus with offence violates fundamental rights
Only Disputed Amount Can Remain Frozen During Ongoing Investigation, Says HC

In this matter, the petitioner, Devraj Singh Shaktawat, approached the High Court through a criminal writ petition to challenge the freezing of his bank account at the IDBI Bank, Circuit House Branch in Bhilwara. The account had been completely blocked by investigative agencies during an inquiry into suspected fraudulent transactions.
The petitioner’s counsel argued that a blanket freeze on the entire account was disproportionate, as it stripped him of the funds necessary for his day-to-day survival and business activities. A key point of contention was that the original freezing order failed to specify the exact "tainted" amount or provide a clear timeline for the restriction. As the case progressed, it became evident that while only a small portion of the funds was actually under suspicion, the bank had nonetheless locked the entire account.Issue Before Court: The court was asked to determine whether investigating authorities have the right to freeze a citizen's entire bank account without identifying a specific disputed sum or establishing a direct, documented link to a cognizable offense.
HC Held: The Rajasthan High Court disposed of the petition by granting the petitioner partial relief. While the Bench acknowledged the power of authorities to freeze accounts during an active investigation, it ruled that such power cannot be exercised in a "blanket" or arbitrary fashion.The Court observed that freezing an entire account without notifying the holder of the specific disputed amount creates unnecessary hardship. The Court noted that such actions can infringe upon the fundamental rights to life and profession guaranteed under Articles 21 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2260My Recent Articles
- ITAT Quashes Reassessment Over Unsigned Section 148 Notice Issued to AssesseePremium
- ITAT Sends Software and SaaS FTS Dispute Back for Fresh Review, Rules DTAA Tax Capping Includes Surcharge and CessPremium
- ITAT Orders Entity-Level Benchmarking for McCain India’s Transfer Pricing DisputePremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 8.49 Crore Additions, Says CIT(A) Can Admit Evidence to Grant ReliefPremium
- ITAT Restores Appeal After Condoning Delay, Says Substantial Justice Must Prevail Over TechnicalitiesPremium
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








