High Court Upholds Section 16(2)(c): No ITC If Supplier Fails to Deposit Tax:

High Court rules that Input Tax Credit is a concession, not a right, making the supplier's tax deposit a mandatory prerequisite for purchasers
Supplier tax payment mandatory for availing input tax credit, Says High Court

The Court also noted that the law does not impose a permanent burden on purchasers, as mechanisms under Section 41(2) and Rule 37A allow reversal and re-availment of ITC once the supplier discharges the tax liability. Rejecting the plea to “read down” the provision, the Court distinguished earlier VAT-era rulings and clarified that the GST regime operates on a different statutory scheme. Therefore, denial of ITC in such cases was held to be legally valid. To mitigate risks, the court suggested that purchasers can protect themselves through indemnity clauses in private contracts with their suppliers.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given BelowAbout Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2264My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones 302-Day Delay, Restores Salary Assessment for Fresh VerificationPremium
- ITAT Condones Delay After Tax Consultant's Death, Restores Appeals for Fresh HearingPremium
- ITAT Remands Salary Addition, Says Taxability Depends on Salary Becoming Due, Not Mere ReceiptPremium
- ITAT Deletes TP Royalty Adjustment, Orders Fresh Review of Commission BenchmarkingPremium
- ITAT Quashes Reassessment Over Unsigned Section 148 Notice Issued to AssesseePremium
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








