High Court Upholds Section 16(2)(c): No ITC If Supplier Fails to Deposit Tax:

High Court rules that Input Tax Credit is a concession, not a right, making the supplier's tax deposit a mandatory prerequisite for purchasers
Supplier tax payment mandatory for availing input tax credit, Says High Court

The Court also noted that the law does not impose a permanent burden on purchasers, as mechanisms under Section 41(2) and Rule 37A allow reversal and re-availment of ITC once the supplier discharges the tax liability. Rejecting the plea to “read down” the provision, the Court distinguished earlier VAT-era rulings and clarified that the GST regime operates on a different statutory scheme. Therefore, denial of ITC in such cases was held to be legally valid. To mitigate risks, the court suggested that purchasers can protect themselves through indemnity clauses in private contracts with their suppliers.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given BelowAbout Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts









