ICAI Disciplinary Committee Finds Concurrent Auditors Guilty for Failure to Detect LC Fraud:

ICAI Disciplinary Committee Finds Concurrent Auditors Guilty for Failure to Detect LC Fraud

CAs held guilty of professional misconduct for lack of due diligence in concurrent audit of high-value LC discounting

ICAI Holds Concurrent Auditors Guilty for Failure to Report LC Fraud at J&K Bank

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 11, 2026
Last update on Feb 11, 2026
ICAI Disciplinary Committee Finds Concurrent Auditors Guilty for Failure to Detect LC Fraud  M/s. Sudan Kapoor & Associates was appointed as concurrent auditor for the Ghaziabad Business Unit of Jammu & Kashmir Bank for the period May 2014 to April 2015. Based on information received from the Bank alleging large-scale fraud in discounting of Letters of Credit (LCs), disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the firm and three Chartered Accountants who had declared themselves as members answerable.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
During the proceedings, the Bank’s internal investigation report revealed that fake and irregular LCs aggregating to Rs. 73.61 crore were discounted at the branch, causing substantial financial loss. Issue Before Committee: Whether the concurrent auditors failed to exercise due diligence and professional care by not reporting material irregularities and fraudulent LC discounting during the audit period. Committee's Order: The Disciplinary Committee held that merely stating “no record found” in audit reports did not amount to adequate audit reporting, particularly when high-value LC transactions were reflected in the bank’s books. The Committee observed that the auditors were expected to independently verify internal records, escalate non-production of documents, and report procedural violations involving LC discounting. The Committee concluded that the auditors failed to report material facts, failed to detect and disclose misstatements, and did not exercise due diligence in the discharge of their professional duties. Therefore, CA Rajesh Sudan and CA Sachin Kumar Sharma were held guilty of professional misconduct under Clauses (5), (6), (7) and (8) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Proceedings against CA Chinky Tripathi were closed as she was not associated with the firm during the relevant audit period. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2160
Up Next

Loading suggestions…