ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Acting as Statutory and Internal Auditor Simultaneously:

ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Acting as Statutory and Internal Auditor Simultaneously

Rs. 2 Lakh Fine Imposed for Violating Section 144 of Companies Act and Failing to Exercise Due Diligence

ICAI Imposes Rs. 2 Lakh Fine for Acting as Statutory and Internal Auditor of Same Company

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 17, 2026
Last update on Feb 17, 2026
ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Acting as Statutory and Internal Auditor Simultaneously A complaint was filed by Smt. Shobha Shandilya, Director of M/s PLN9 Security Services Pvt. Ltd., against CA Amit Agrawal, statutory auditor of the company for FY 2014-15 and 2015-16, and reappointed for FY 2016-17 until his resignation in October 2017.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
In December 2016, while holding office as statutory auditor, the Respondent accepted an internal audit assignment of the same company and issued a Review Report dated 22.01.2017 for April-November 2016, along with a limited review for FY 2015-16. Email correspondence established acceptance of the assignment and agreed professional fees of Rs. 2 lakh. Issue Raised: Whether accepting internal audit work while serving as statutory auditor, and failing to report material discrepancies in the statutory audit report, constituted professional misconduct under Items (5), (6), (7) and (8) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
Committee's Decision: The Disciplinary Committee of the The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India held that acceptance of internal audit services during tenure as statutory auditor was a clear violation of Section 144 of the Companies Act, 2013 and impaired auditor independence. The plea that statutory audit for FY 2016-17 had not commenced was rejected, as the Respondent continued to hold office during the relevant period. The Committee further held that failure to disclose discrepancies relating to salary, wages and unauthorised expenses in the statutory audit report reflected lack of due diligence and insufficient audit evidence. Thus, the Respondent was found guilty of professional misconduct under Items (5), (6), (7) and (8) of Part I of the Second Schedule. By order dated February 2026, he was reprimanded and fined Rs. 2,00,000, payable within 60 days. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2158
Up Next

Loading suggestions…