ICAI Finds Chartered Accountant Guilty of Misconduct in Loan Fraud Audit Case:

Disciplinary committee penalizes auditor for negligence in certifying financial statements used to obtain bank loan.
Failure to verify financial records before certification held professional misconduct by disciplinary committee

ICAI Finds Chartered Accountant Guilty of Misconduct in Loan Fraud Audit Case
A complaint was filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation against a chartered accountant alleging serious lapses during the audit of a company’s financial statements. The investigation revealed that the auditor had certified financial statements for two financial years showing significantly inflated turnover and profits. These documents were later used by the company to secure a bank credit facility of about Rs. 10.35 crore.
According to the investigation, the figures reflected in the audited accounts were far higher than the company’s actual transactions. The loan eventually turned into a non-performing asset, leading to substantial loss for the bank. The matter was subsequently examined by the disciplinary authorities under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Main Issue: Whether the auditor was guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 for failing to exercise due diligence and displaying gross negligence while certifying the company’s financial statements.
Tribunal Held: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India disciplinary committee held the auditor guilty of professional misconduct. It observed that basic audit checks—such as examining books of accounts, bank records and tax documents were not properly carried out before the financial statements were certified.
The committee rejected the defence that the auditor merely relied on information provided by the company’s management. It emphasized that an auditor is expected to independently verify financial data and maintain professional skepticism. In view of the serious lapse, the committee reprimanded the member and imposed a monetary penalty of Rs. 1,00,000, directing that the amount be paid within thirty days.
To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2220My Recent Articles
- ITAT: Carbon Credit Receipts Are Capital, Not Taxable Under Income TaxPremium
- Gujarat HC Quashes Section 148 Notice After Reassessment Proceedings Were DroppedPremium
- High Court Denies GST Refund After Delayed Tribunal Appeal Beyond Section 112 TimelinePremium
- ITAT Allows Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS Compensation Despite Return OmissionPremium
- High Court Refuses Interference in Anti-Dumping Duty Matter Due to Alternative RemedyPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








