ITAT Condones 842-Day Delay in Filing Appeal Before CIT(A), Holds Justice Cannot Be Denied on Technical Grounds:
The ITAT condones an 842-day delay in filing a Section 271(1)(c) penalty appeal and restores the matter for fresh adjudication on merits following principles of natural justice.
ITAT Restores Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Appeal for Fresh Hearing
Saloni Kumari
Jul 9, 2026
Premium
ITAT Condones 842-Day Delay in Filing Appeal Before CIT(A), Holds Justice Cannot Be Denied on Technical Grounds
The ITAT condones an 842-day delay in filing a Section 271(1)(c) penalty appeal and restores the matter for fresh adjudication on merits following principles of natural justice.
Also Read
ITAT Holds Client Code Modification Alone Cannot Justify Section 69 AdditionITAT Condones 48-Day Delay in Section 80P Dispute, Cites Senior Citizens’ Technical Difficulties With Online Tax PortalITAT Remands Case of Section 69A Unexplained Cash Deposits During Demonetisation Period After CIT(A) Passes Ex Parte Order ITAT Remands Unexplained Cash Credit Addition to AO for Fresh Adjudication
About Author
Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2675My Recent Articles
- CBI Court Chennai Convicts and Sentences One Private Company and Six Other Individuals in Rs 2.68 Crore Bank Fraud Case
- Diligent Media Corporation Faces Rs 1.12 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Claimed From Ab Initio Cancelled Vendor
- ITAT Remands Case of Section 69A Unexplained Cash Deposits During Demonetisation Period After CIT(A) Passes Ex Parte OrderPremium
- ITAT Upholds BSNL VRS Tax Relief, Applies Rs 25 Lakh Leave Encashment Limit RetrospectivelyPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 8.56 Lakh Addition, Holds Same Property Cannot Have Different Valuations for Joint OwnersPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts