ITAT Condones Nearly 6-Year Delayed Appeal of NRI, Remands Rs 25.44 Lakh Addition to AO for Fresh Consideration:

ITAT condoned a 2,273-day delay in an NRI assessee’s appeal and remanded the Rs 25.44 lakh income addition to the AO for fresh adjudication.
ITAT Condones 2273-Day Delay

Premium
ITAT Condones Nearly 6-Year Delayed Appeal of NRI, Remands Rs 25.44 Lakh Addition to AO for Fresh Consideration
ITAT condoned a 2,273-day delay in an NRI assessee’s appeal and remanded the Rs 25.44 lakh income addition to the AO for fresh adjudication.
Also Read
ICAI Releases New Guidance Note on Section 92E Transfer Pricing ReportITAT Deletes Rs 42.42 Lakh Tax Additions, Rejects Department’s Accommodation Entry Claim Over Refunded Business AdvancesITAT Deletes Section 69 Unexplained Investment Addition After Father-in-Law’s ITR Establishes Source of Stamp Duty PaymentMere Expense Disallowance Cannot Trigger Section 271(1)(c) Penalty; ITAT Partly Allows Appeal
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2625My Recent Articles
- Godavari Biorefineries Faces Rs 17.02 Crore Demand Over Non-Payment of GST on ENA Supplies to KSBCL
- ITAT Deletes Section 69 Unexplained Investment Addition After Father-in-Law’s ITR Establishes Source of Stamp Duty PaymentPremium
- Mere Expense Disallowance Cannot Trigger Section 271(1)(c) Penalty; ITAT Partly Allows AppealPremium
- ROC: Company and Directors Faces Penalty for Not Having Any Office at Registered Location of BusinessPremium
- ROC Imposes Penalty on Company and Director for Failure to Furnish Financial Statements for FY 2021-22
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







