ITAT Deletes Rs 34.79 Lakh Unexplained Cash Deposit Addition After Same Deposits Taxed in Father’s Hands:
ITAT deleted a Rs 34.79 lakh addition on alleged unexplained cash deposits after finding that the same deposits had already been taxed in the hands of the assessee’s father.
ITAT Condones 28-Day Delay
Saloni Kumari
Aug 27, 2026
Premium
ITAT Deletes Rs 34.79 Lakh Unexplained Cash Deposit Addition After Same Deposits Taxed in Father’s Hands
ITAT deleted a Rs 34.79 lakh addition on alleged unexplained cash deposits after finding that the same deposits had already been taxed in the hands of the assessee’s father.
Also Read
ITAT Holds Section 263 Revision Invalid on Taxability of Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition ActITAT Upholds Section 68 Addition for Bogus Loans But Restricts Estimated Profit to 2% of SalesITAT Remands Rs 22.98 Lakh TDS Demand Dispute, Directs Examination of IBC Moratorium Claim After Verification of Supporting DocumentsHigh Court Strikes Down Retrospective Section 147A of Income Tax Act
About Author
Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2926My Recent Articles
- Defective Section 129 Penalty Order Cannot Sustain Penalty Without Effective Hearing Opportunity, Holds GSTAT
- Intent to Evade Tax Not Necessary for Penalty Under Section 129 for Expired E-Way Bills, Holds GSTAT
- Major Relief in Arbitration Case: MCIA Denies Rs 908 Crore Statement Claim Made by Allied Silica Against Tata Chemicals
- MCA and ICSI to Hold User Awareness Session on Form AOC-4 Filing Amid Glitches on MCA-21 Version-3 Portal
- GSTN Introduces New E-Invoicing Facility for Self-Invoices Under Reverse Charge Mechanism
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts