ITAT Deletes Rs. 35.22 Lakh Demonetisation Addition; Cash Sales Accepted as Genuine:

ITAT Deletes Rs. 35.22 Lakh Demonetisation Addition; Cash Sales Accepted as Genuine

Retailer’s cash deposits during December 2016 held explained by recorded cash sales and sufficient cash balance

ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition of Rs. 35.22 Lakh

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 15, 2026
Last update on Feb 15, 2026
ITAT Deletes Rs. 35.22 Lakh Demonetisation Addition; Cash Sales Accepted as Genuine The assessee, Marche Retail Pvt. Ltd., engaged in FMCG wholesale and retail business through multiple outlets, filed its return for AY 2017-18, declaring income of Rs. 59.94 lakh. During the assessment, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee had deposited Rs. 1.44 crore in Specified Bank Notes (SBNs) during the demonetisation period.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The AO held that certain deposits of amount Rs. 35,22,000, were not satisfactorily explained and treated them as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 read with Section 115BBE. The first appellate authority dismissed the appeal ex parte for non-prosecution, confirming the addition without examining the material already on record. Main Issue: Whether cash deposits of Rs. 35,22,000 made during the demonetization period could be treated as unexplained under Section 68 despite sufficient recorded cash sales and available cash balance in audited books.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
ITAT's Decision: The ITAT observed that the assessee had furnished detailed cash deposit statements, bank confirmations, VAT returns and sales records during assessment. The Tribunal noted that as on the date of demonetisation, the assessee had a closing cash balance of Rs.1.48 crore and had recorded substantial cash sales during November and December 2016. The deposits made during the period were found to be well within the available cash balance generated from regular business operations. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer merely doubted the timing of deposits without bringing any material to show that the cash was not available or that the deposits were not out of recorded sales. In the absence of any contrary evidence, the addition of Rs. 35,22,000 was found to be unjustified. Therefore, the addition under Section 68 read with Section 115BBE was deleted and the appeal was allowed. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…