ITAT Mumbai Deletes Rs. 37.21 Lakh Notional Gratuity Addition, Actuarial Gratuity Gain Not Real Income:

ITAT Mumbai held that a notional actuarial gratuity gain cannot be taxed and directed full recalculation of refund interest under Section 244A.
ITAT Rules Notional Gratuity Gain Not Taxable; Orders Full 244A Interest

ITAT Mumbai Deletes Rs. 37.21 Lakh Notional Gratuity Addition, Actuarial Gratuity Gain Not Real Income
ITAT Mumbai deleted a notional gratuity gain added under Section 143(1), holding it non-taxable. It also directed recalculation of full Section 244A interest, ruling that refunds must carry interest until the actual date of payment.
The case had been filed by a company named Reliance Commercial Dealers Limited before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai, challenging an order passed by the CIT(A) on March 12, 2025. The dispute in this case is regarding an addition of Rs. 37,21,235 made during the processing of the return under Section 143(1) and a short grant of interest under Section 244A.
While filing its income tax return (ITR) for the assessment year 2021-22, the company declared its total loss of Rs. (-) 1,78,03,55,507. The tax department processed the return on September 22, 2022, under section 143(1)(a) of the Act, accepting the total income of the company as NIL.
Later, the return was deeply scrutinised, and notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued. In response to the notice, the company furnished all the relevant documents and details as requested in the notice. The tax department did not discover anything wrong with the return, hence completed the assessment under section 143(3), and the total income was kept as NIL, the same as what was earlier shown in the initial processing. However, it made an addition to the company's income on account of a mismatch with the tax audit report amounting to Rs. 37.21 lakh.
The aggrieved company, unhappy with the action of the tax department, approached CIT(A). However, the authority confirmed the addition of Rs. 37.21 lakh made by the tax department, ruling that since earlier years had MAT adjustments, this year’s amount should be taxed. Directed the tax department only to recheck the interest calculation, but did not allow the claim to be fully.
The company thereafter filed an appeal before the ITAT Mumbai. There, the company claimed that the Rs. 37,21,235 is not real income. It is only a notional actuarial gain on gratuity valuation shown under Other Comprehensive Income (OCI), not in the profit and loss account. Such OCI items do not affect taxable income because income tax computation starts from "profit before tax." Earlier years had similar actuarial losses, but those were never claimed as deductions. Hence, the current year’s gain also should not be taxed. The company also claimed short TDS credit and interest under Section 244A.
The tribunal analysed the arguments of both sides and ruled that actuarial gain on gratuity is not taxable; it is a notional figure. It appears under Other Comprehensive Income, not as part of real business income. Gratuity deduction is allowed only on a payment basis (Section 43B), and the company never claimed any such deduction in earlier years. Hence, it is not justified and fair to make an addition of this notional gain to the income of taxpayers. In conclusion to the aforementioned findings, the tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 37,21,235. Interest under Section 244A must be paid till the date the refund is actually issued. ITAT directed the tax authorities to recalculate the full interest following High Court rulings.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2462My Recent Articles
- A Taxpayer Must Be Granted a Minimum 7-Day Time Limit to Respond to a Section 148A(b) Notice, Holds ITAT Premium
- Income Tax Dept Introduces Additional Field To Disclose Secondary Address in All ITR Forms for AY 2026-27
- ITAT Strikes Down Entire Reassessment Proceedings Over Unsigned Section 148 NoticePremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 271B Penalty, Holds Form 3CD Reporting Error Covered Under Reasonable CausePremium
- A Taxpayer Cannot Be Forced to Pay GST Twice Merely Because Tax Paid Under Wrong Head, Rules High CourtPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








