ITAT Quashes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty on EPF Disallowance for Lack Of Satisfaction:
The ITAT Delhi held that penalty cannot be sustained when satisfaction was recorded only for Transfer Price Adjustment
ITAT Quashed a Penalty of Rs 1.20 Crores
Saima
Jul 22, 2026Premium
ITAT Quashes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty on EPF Disallowance for Lack Of Satisfaction
The ITAT Delhi held that penalty cannot be sustained when satisfaction was recorded only for Transfer Price Adjustment
Also Read
ITAT Upholds Rs 10.91 Lakh Addition on Unrecorded Job Work Transactions at 8% Profit RateITAT Holds Documented Sources Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment494-Day Delay Condoned: ITAT Pune Directs CIT(A) to Reconsider Tax AppealITAT Restores Section 270A Penalty Dispute for Fresh Adjudication After Condoning 52-Day Delay
About Author
Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
285My Recent Articles
- ITAT Holds Documented Sources Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained InvestmentPremium
- ITAT Upholds 8% Profit Addition on Unrecorded Job Work Transactions Found in Loose PapersPremium
- ITAT Rules Payment Through Banking Channels and Donation Receipt Cannot Establish Genuine DonationPremium
- ITAT Holds Third-Party Loose Papers Are Insufficient Without CorroborationPremium
- AAR Clarifies Papad Khar Classifiable Under HSN 28362090 And Attracts 18% GSTPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Tags
Recent Posts
All Posts