ITAT Rejects Section 69 Addition in Failed Property Deal Case:
ITAT deleted Section 69 addition after finding refunded property deposit fully supported by banking records.
Tribunal accepts refunded security deposit supported by complete banking records.
Meetu Kumari
Jul 4, 2026Premium
ITAT Rejects Section 69 Addition in Failed Property Deal Case
ITAT deleted Section 69 addition after finding refunded property deposit fully supported by banking records.
Also Read
ITAT Holds Cost of Acquisition Cannot Be Taken as Nil Merely Because Old Records Are UnavailableITAT Remands Section 69 Unexplained Cash Credit Addition After Bank Statement Was Not ExaminedITAT Holds Miscommunication Between Assessee and Counsel As Sufficient to Warrant Fresh Adjudication ITAT Remands Transfer Pricing Dispute: DRP to Reassess Comparables and Working Capital Adjustment
About Author
Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts