ITAT Relief: Section 54 Exemption Not Lost Due to Builder Delay:

ITAT Relief: Section 54 Exemption Not Lost Due to Builder Delay

ITAT has allowed Section 54 exemption for unutilized amount in capital gain due to builder’s failure

ITAT Allows Section 54 Exemption Despite Delay in Property Possession

authorMeetu KumaridateJun 23, 2025
Last update on Jun 23, 2025
ITAT Relief: Section 54 Exemption Not Lost Due to Builder Delay The assessee had sold a property in February 2012, deposited Rs. 2 crore in a Capital Gains Account in May 2012, and booked a new under-construction property for Rs. 1.60 crore. A balance of Rs. 42 lakh was still owed, though, because the builder failed to obtain the Occupation Certificate. Of this amount, Rs. 37.88 lakh was considered an unutilised capital gain and was subjected to taxation as "income from other sources."
Income Tax Dept. Notifies Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission for Exemption u/s 10
Issue Before the Tribunal: Whether exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act can be denied for the portion of capital gain unutilized within the statutory 3-year window due to the builder’s failure to obtain a possession/occupation certificate, despite the assessee having booked and partly paid for a new residential property?
High Court: ITC Cannot be Denied for Retrospective Cancellation of Supplier's GSTN
Tribunal's Decision: The ITAT granted relief to the assessee, accepting his position that he could not utilise the full capital gains within the three-year window under Section 54 due to the builder’s failure to deliver possession. The Tribunal held that the assessee had no control over the delay in possession and relied on past rulings, including Bal Kishan Atal v. ACIT and the Delhi High Court's ruling in CIT v. R.L. Sood. It was highlighted that as the assessee was unable to use the capital gains for no fault of his own. The tribunal removed the addition of Rs. 37,88,384, thereby validating the claim under Section 54. Thus, allowing the appeal in full, the Hon'ble tribunal found the addition of Rs. 37.88 lakh unsustainable and deleted it favouring the assessee. To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2158
Up Next

Loading suggestions…