ITAT Remands Assessment for Fresh Verification of Property Investment and Section 80C Deduction:

ITAT Remands Assessment for Fresh Verification of Property Investment and Section 80C Deduction

The ITAT Patna directs fresh assessment after AO failed to verify assessee’s explanation and supporting evidence.

ITAT Set Aside Assessment

authorSaimadateOct 23, 2026
Last update on Oct 22, 2026

The assessee is Amit Kumar Rai who filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2020–21, declaring a total income of Rs 3,36,240. Based on information that he had purchased immovable property jointly with Rubi Rai and Chandra Mohan Ojha, the AO initiated reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act.

Man Carrying Rs 25,000 Reward Arrested in Rs 1.22 Crore GST Evasion Case Involving Fake Firms in Bulandshahr

The information indicated that the assessee had paid Rs 5 lakh in cash towards the property, while a further amount of Rs 35 lakh had been paid by Chandra Mohan Ojha on his behalf. During the reassessment proceedings, the assessee failed to provide a satisfactory explanation regarding the source of the cash payment and the amount paid on his behalf. Consequently, the AO made an addition of Rs 5 lakh under Section 69A of the Act, treated Rs 35 lakh as a deemed gift, and disallowed the assessee’s deduction claim of Rs 1,50,000 under Section 80C for want of supporting evidence. These additions and disallowances were upheld by the CIT(A). 

No Separate Section 69C Unexplained Expenditure Addition Allowed After Accepting Section 44AD Income Without Supporting Evidence: ITAT

After considering the submissions, the Tribunal observed that the assessee had furnished certain information before the AO regarding the source of the disputed investments but had failed to produce supporting documents. At the same time, the AO had not conducted any inquiry or verification into the explanations submitted by the assessee.

Rajasthan Police Warns of WhatsApp Account Hacking Scams, Urges People to Beware of Fake QR Codes and OTP Fraud

The Tribunal also noted that the CIT(A) had directed the AO to verify the year in which the sale deed was executed. Considering these circumstances, the Tribunal held that the matter required fresh examination rather than being decided without the necessary factual verification. Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside the assessment and directed the AO to frame the assessment fresh after carrying out the necessary inquiries and verification.

About Author

LinkedIn

Saima

Content Writer

Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
565
Up Next

Loading suggestions…