ITAT Remands Section 12AB Registration Application for Fresh Consideration :

ITAT Remands Section 12AB Registration Application for Fresh Consideration

The ITAT Lucknow held that failure to explain delay cannot justify summary rejection without giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.

CIT(E) Rejects Condonation Request

authorSaimadateNov 12, 2026
Last update on Nov 12, 2026

Riddhima Shiksha Samiti had initially been granted provisional registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, through an order issued by the CPC on May 27, 2021, valid for Assessment Years 2021-22 to 2023-24.

ITAT Remands Addition Under Section 68 for Verification of Erroneous Opening Capital

Under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act, the assessee was required to apply for regular registration in Form No. 10AB at least six months before the expiry of its provisional approval or within six months of commencement of its activities, whichever was earlier. Accordingly, the application was due by September 30, 2023, which was subsequently extended to June 30, 2024, by CBDT Circular No. 7/2024 dated April 25, 2024.

However, the assessee failed to submit the application within the prescribed period. Upon discovering the omission, it filed an application for regular registration along with a condonation petition on September 30, 2025, explaining that the delay had occurred due to a bona fide procedural mistake and lack of awareness regarding the requirement. The CIT (E) rejected the condonation request, holding that no satisfactory explanation had been furnished for the delay. Consequently, the assessee's application for permanent registration under Section 12AB(1)(b)(ii)(B) was not considered on merits, resulting in a tax demand for AY 2023-24 and difficulties in seeking registration for subsequent years.

ITAT Quashes Rs 18.24 Lakh Tax Addition After DVO Values Land at Price Equal to Its Initial Purchase Price

The Tribunal observed that the CIT (E) had rejected the condonation application merely on the ground of delay without recording any cogent reasons for rejecting the explanation furnished by the assessee. It further noted that the assessee had not been provided an effective opportunity of hearing before the adverse decision was taken.

ITAT Remands Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition to AO for Fresh Verification

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal held that the matter required fresh consideration rather than rejection of the assessee's request without proper examination. Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside the matter and restored the assessee's application to the file of the CIT(E) for fresh consideration on merits. 

About Author

LinkedIn

Saima

Content Writer

Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
637
Up Next

Loading suggestions…