ITAT Rules Interest Reflected in Form 26AS Cannot Alone Determine Taxability, Assessee Must Prove that FD Funds Belonged to Another Entity:
The ITAT Bangalore has restored a dispute to the AO concerning taxability of fixed deposit interest earned on funds belonging to another company.
ITAT Remands FD Interest Taxability Dispute
Saima
Jul 18, 2026Premium
ITAT Rules Interest Reflected in Form 26AS Cannot Alone Determine Taxability, Assessee Must Prove that FD Funds Belonged to Another Entity
The ITAT Bangalore has restored a dispute to the AO concerning taxability of fixed deposit interest earned on funds belonging to another company.
Also Read
ITAT Upholds Deletion of Bogus Purchase Additions Lacking Search EvidenceITAT Deletes Rs 92.04 Lakh Additions in Industrial Property Purchase CaseITAT Condones 650-Day Delay in Matter of Unexplained Cash Deposits During Specified Bank Notes PeriodITAT Remands TDS Disallowance Matter to CIT(A) for Fresh Adjudication
About Author
Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
178My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rules Revision Cannot Be Used to Extend Limitation for Issues Not Covered in Reassessment Premium
- High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Based on Retrospective Application of Section 55A AmendmentPremium
- High Court Quashes Section 179 Proceedings Against Directors for Lack of Reasonable Opportunity Premium
- High Court Rules Reassessment Notice under Section 148 Cannot Be Issued on Mere Change of OpinionPremium
- High Court rules CGST Adjudication Challenges Involving Sections 74(9), 75(4), 70 and 122 Do Not Automatically Warrant Article 226 InterferencePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts