ITAT Rules Section 54 Shortfall Cannot Be Treated as Concealment when Investment Period Had Not Expired:
The ITAT Mumbai deleted penalty as unutilised section 54 amount was not taxable in original Assessment Year
ITAT Deletes Rs 5.25 Lakh Penalty
Saima
Sep 2, 2026
Premium
ITAT Rules Section 54 Shortfall Cannot Be Treated as Concealment when Investment Period Had Not Expired
The ITAT Mumbai deleted penalty as unutilised section 54 amount was not taxable in original Assessment Year
Also Read
High Court Quashes Tax Recovery Order Against Former Company Director, Says Authorities Failed to Consider Reply and Supporting DocumentsITAT Allows Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS Compensation ITAT Rejects Appeal, Confirms Rs 4.50 Lakh Addition as Unexplained Cash After Assessee Fails to Prove Source of DepositsUndisclosed Foreign Assets? Income Tax Department Activates Form 1 under FAST-DS 2026 on E-Filing Portal
About Author
Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
377My Recent Articles
- ITAT Allows Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS Compensation Premium
- ITAT Holds Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Eligible for Section 80P Deduction on Credit Facility IncomePremium
- ITAT Remands 80G Approval Application to CIT(E) After Denial Without Granting AdjournmentPremium
- ITAT Remands Rs 1.36 Crore Cash Deposit Addition for Fresh AssessmentPremium
- ITAT Quashes Section 263 Revision as Time-BarredPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts