ITAT Rules Section 54 Shortfall Cannot Be Treated as Concealment when Investment Period Had Not Expired:
The ITAT Mumbai deleted penalty as unutilised section 54 amount was not taxable in original Assessment Year
ITAT Deletes Rs 5.25 Lakh Penalty
Saima
Sep 2, 2026
Premium
ITAT Rules Section 54 Shortfall Cannot Be Treated as Concealment when Investment Period Had Not Expired
The ITAT Mumbai deleted penalty as unutilised section 54 amount was not taxable in original Assessment Year
Also Read
IT Department Urges Select Taxpayers to Disclose Undeclared Overseas Assets Under FAST-DSFormer Employee Secures Major Relief: ITAT Allows Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS 2019 CompensationIncome Tax Department Reminds Taxpayers to Meet TDS Compliance Deadlines as Q2 Return Filing Date ApproachesHigh Court Holds No Further Assessment Proceedings Warranted After Earlier Appeal Dismissal
About Author
Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
583My Recent Articles
- GSTAT Quashes Rs 1.96 Lakh Penalty on G P Motors for Stock Transfer Without E-Way Bill
- GSTAT Upholds Rs 12.55 Lakh Penalty on Undeclared Goods
- GSTAT Upholds GST Demand After Rejecting Manual Invoices Produced Three Months After Inspection
- GSTAT Holds GST Portal Glitches Cannot Defeat Statutory Remedy
- GSTAT Allows ITC of Previous Financial Year to Be Claimed in April 2019
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts