ROC Imposes Penalty on Statutory Auditor for Incorrect Audit Disclosure on Charges:

ROC Imposes Penalty on Statutory Auditor for Incorrect Audit Disclosure on Charges

Penalty under Section 450 upheld for failure to report registered charges in audit report

ROC Guwahati Penalises Auditor for Failure to Report Registered Charges

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 7, 2026
Last update on Feb 7, 2026
ROC Imposes Penalty on Statutory Auditor for Incorrect Audit Disclosure on Charges Bhartia Infra Projects Limited was subjected to inspection pursuant to a Ministry of Corporate Affairs order dated 19.02.2024. During inspection, it was observed that in the notes to financial statements for the year ended 31.03.2022, the company had disclosed that no charges were required to be registered or satisfied during the year. However, as per MCA records, 44 charges were created during FY 2021–22.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
Still, the statutory auditor did not qualify or report the same in the audit report. Based on the inspection findings, proceedings were initiated against the statutory auditor, Shri Manish Kumar Pareek, for violation of Section 143(3)(h) of the Companies Act, 2013. A show cause notice was issued, to which the auditor responded seeking a lenient view. Main Issue: Whether failure by the statutory auditor to report material discrepancies relating to registered charges in the audit report amounted to a violation attracting penalty under Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
ROC's Decision: The Registrar of Companies, acting as the Adjudicating Officer, held that the statutory auditor failed to comply with the reporting requirements under Section 143(3)(h) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Adjudicating Officer imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000 on the auditor under Section 450. No additional daily penalty was levied, as the default was taken care of. The auditor was directed to pay the penalty from personal sources within 90 days and informed of the right to appeal before the Regional Director, Guwahati. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

LinkedIn

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2231
Up Next

Loading suggestions…