ROC Imposes Penalty on Statutory Auditor for Incorrect Audit Disclosure on Charges:

Penalty under Section 450 upheld for failure to report registered charges in audit report
ROC Guwahati Penalises Auditor for Failure to Report Registered Charges

ROC Imposes Penalty on Statutory Auditor for Incorrect Audit Disclosure on Charges
Bhartia Infra Projects Limited was subjected to inspection pursuant to a Ministry of Corporate Affairs order dated 19.02.2024. During inspection, it was observed that in the notes to financial statements for the year ended 31.03.2022, the company had disclosed that no charges were required to be registered or satisfied during the year. However, as per MCA records, 44 charges were created during FY 2021–22.
Still, the statutory auditor did not qualify or report the same in the audit report. Based on the inspection findings, proceedings were initiated against the statutory auditor, Shri Manish Kumar Pareek, for violation of Section 143(3)(h) of the Companies Act, 2013. A show cause notice was issued, to which the auditor responded seeking a lenient view.
Main Issue: Whether failure by the statutory auditor to report material discrepancies relating to registered charges in the audit report amounted to a violation attracting penalty under Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013.
ROC's Decision: The Registrar of Companies, acting as the Adjudicating Officer, held that the statutory auditor failed to comply with the reporting requirements under Section 143(3)(h) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Adjudicating Officer imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000 on the auditor under Section 450. No additional daily penalty was levied, as the default was taken care of. The auditor was directed to pay the penalty from personal sources within 90 days and informed of the right to appeal before the Regional Director, Guwahati.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2188My Recent Articles
- ITAT Allows Section 80P Deduction on Interest From Co-operative BanksPremium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition on Marriage Gift and Household Cash ExplanationPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs.1.36 Crore Section 69A Addition Against Customs House AgentPremium
- ITAT Remands Charitable Trust Taxation Dispute Despite Denial of Section 12A RegistrationPremium
- ITAT Deletes Addition Based on Form 26AS Mismatch, Bars Double TaxationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








