ROC Penalises Company and Directors for Not Mentioning DINs of Directors on AOC-4 Forms Balance Sheets:
Company and directors face penalty for contravening the provisions of Section 158 by not mentioning the DINs of its directors on the AOC-4 forms balance sheets.
Rs 3 Lakh Penalty Imposed on Company and Directors for Section 158 Violation
Saloni Kumari
Aug 20, 2026Premium
ROC Penalises Company and Directors for Not Mentioning DINs of Directors on AOC-4 Forms Balance Sheets
Company and directors face penalty for contravening the provisions of Section 158 by not mentioning the DINs of its directors on the AOC-4 forms balance sheets.
Also Read
CBI Apprehends DGMS Deputy Director Over Alleged Bribe for Favourable Report in Fatal Quarry Accident CaseMCA Notifies Key Amendments to Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules in Consultation With NFRACentre Notifies Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2026: Key Amendments to Income Tax, Finance and Payment LawsROC Penalises Company and Director Rs 20,000 for Wrong AGM Date in Form AOC-4CFS
About Author
Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2610My Recent Articles
- Delhi High Court Allows SC and HC Judges to File or Revise ITR Under New Regime Without Listing Certain AllowancesPremium
- Substantial Justice Prevails Over Technicalities: ITAT Condones 171-Day Delay in Section 54 Exemption Dispute Due to Ill HealthPremium
- Health Issues Behind ITR Default: ITAT Condoned 116-Day Delay, Restores Rs 20.19 Lakh Tax Dispute for Fresh HearingPremium
- ITAT Grants Full Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS Compensation to Former Employee Despite Delayed ClaimPremium
- ICAI Holds CA Guilty of Professional Misconduct Over Client Solicitation and Audit Assignment ViolationsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts