ROC Penalises Company and Directors for Not Mentioning DINs of Directors on AOC-4 Forms Balance Sheets:

Company and directors face penalty for contravening the provisions of Section 158 by not mentioning the DINs of its directors on the AOC-4 forms balance sheets.
Rs 3 Lakh Penalty Imposed on Company and Directors for Section 158 Violation

Premium
ROC Penalises Company and Directors for Not Mentioning DINs of Directors on AOC-4 Forms Balance Sheets
Company and directors face penalty for contravening the provisions of Section 158 by not mentioning the DINs of its directors on the AOC-4 forms balance sheets.
Also Read
MCA Issues Major AOC-4 Filing Update for OPCs; Deadline Set for September 27United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax DisputeHigh Court Quashes Service Tax Demand Against Assam Rifles Group Insurance Scheme FM allows Inventory-Based E-Commerce for Indian Goods Exports [Read Notification]
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2729My Recent Articles
- Max Healthcare Faces NCLT Proceedings Over Kalinga Hospital; Next Hearing Scheduled for Sept 28
- Mere Assumptions Cannot Sustain Addition: Rs 15.72 Lakh Cash Addition Deleted After ITAT Finds No Incriminating EvidencePremium
- ITAT Allows Normal Tax Rate on Rs 75 Lakh Survey Surrender, Rejects 60% Section 115BBE LevyPremium
- HC Sets Aside Ex Parte Adjudication Order After SCN Merely Uploaded on GST Portal under 'Additional Notice and Orders' TabPremium
- ITAT Sets Aside Section 263 Revision Order After PCIT Lacked Jurisdiction to Revise Issue Already Considered by CIT(A)Premium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








