ROC Penalises Company's Eight Directors Over Non-Appointment of Two Independent Directors for FY 2015-16 to 2018-19:
ROC imposes a penalty of 8 lakh on eight directors of a company for the non-appointment of two independent directors on the board for the period from financial year 2015-16 to 2018-19.
Company Faces Rs 8 Lakh Penalty for Section 172 Violation
Saloni Kumari
Aug 15, 2026
Premium
ROC Penalises Company's Eight Directors Over Non-Appointment of Two Independent Directors for FY 2015-16 to 2018-19
ROC imposes a penalty of 8 lakh on eight directors of a company for the non-appointment of two independent directors on the board for the period from financial year 2015-16 to 2018-19.
Also Read
MCA Issues FAQs on Registration of Foreign Companies and Indian SubsidiariesROC: Company and Directors Faces Penalty for Not Having Any Office at Registered Location of BusinessROC Imposes Penalty on Company and Director for Failure to Furnish Financial Statements for FY 2021-22Company and Directors Face Penalty for Not Filing Declaration within 180 Days of Incorporation: ROC
About Author
Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2701My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
- ITAT Restores Appeal Over Rs 9.33 Crore Section 68 Share Application Addition After DTVSV Payment FailurePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts