ROC Punishes Company and Director for Non-Maintenance of Meeting Records:

ROC Bangalore penalised the company and its director for failing to maintain proper statutory meeting records and non-compliance with the Companies Act, 2013.
Failure to Maintain Minutes Lands Company Trouble

ROC Punishes Company and Director for Non-Maintenance of Meeting Records
The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Bangalore, has imposed a penalty amounting to Rs 3,000 on the company, AVK Valves India Private Limited and one of its directors among eight for violating Section 118(11) of the Companies Act, 2013. During the inquiry of the disputed company, the Inquiry Officer (IO) found that the company had not properly maintained official records (minutes) of its Board meetings and General meetings under the Secretarial standard 1 and 2 for tax years 2020-21 and 2021-22.
To clarify the same, the company and its directors were asked to respond through an online system (E-module), however, no one furnished a reply there. Despite the company and directors not filing any reply, they were still awarded a second opportunity for a hearing by the office. Since the company failed to properly adhere to the company's rules and also failed to properly respond. The authority considered it a contravention to the provisions of Section 118(11) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Considering the same, the office imposed a penalty of Rs 25,000 on the company, AVK Valves India Private Limited and Rs 5,000 on its director, Deepak Baliga. They both have been directed to pay the imposed penalty amount and rectify the aforementioned default within the time limit of 90 days from receiving the order.
Furthermore, if the company is not satisfied with the present order, it can challenge the same by filing an appeal in writing before the Regional Director, RD Bangalore, within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of this order.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2491My Recent Articles
- ITAT Holds CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Taxpayer’s Appeal Merely Over Non-Prosecution Without Merit HearingPremium
- ITAT Remands TDS Appeal After CIT(A) Failed to Decide Actual CAM Charges IssuePremium
- ITAT Rules in Taxpayer's Favour, Holds Delay in Filing Form 67 Cannot Be Sole Ground to Deny Foreign Tax CreditPremium
- ITAT Revives Tax Appeals for Six AYs After Finding Insufficient Hearing Time and Ignored Adjournment RequestPremium
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity to Explain Rs 2.39 Crore Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition After Main Director’s DeathPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








