Supreme Court Reduces Rs. 2 Crore NCDRC Compensation for bad haircut to Rs. 25 Lakh

Apex Court Modifies Award; Limits Payout to Amount Already Released to Complainant

Supreme Court Slashes Rs. 2 Crore Compensation in ITC Maurya Salon Case

Meetu Kumari | Mar 5, 2026 |

Supreme Court Reduces Rs. 2 Crore NCDRC Compensation for bad haircut to Rs. 25 Lakh

Supreme Court Reduces Rs. 2 Crore NCDRC Compensation for bad haircut to Rs. 25 Lakh

The respondent, Aashna Roy, visited the beauty salon at the appellant’s ITC Maurya Hotel in New Delhi on April 12, 2018, for a haircut. Dissatisfied with the service, she filed a complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in July 2018, alleging deficiency in service and medical negligence.

The NCDRC, vide an order dated September 21, 2021, found the hotel guilty and awarded a staggering compensation of Rs. 2,00,00,000. After an initial round of litigation where the Supreme Court remitted the case back for fresh consideration, the NCDRC reaffirmed the Rs. 2 crore award on April 25, 2023. The appellant then moved the Supreme Court to challenge the quantum of this compensation.

Issue Before SC: Whether the NCDRC was justified in awarding a compensation of Rs. 2,00,00,000 for deficiency in service without a scientific or evidentiary assessment of the actual loss suffered by the respondent.

SC’s Decision: The Supreme Court of India partly allowed the appeal and substantially reduced the compensation awarded by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

The Court held that although deficiency in service was established, the compensation awarded by the NCDRC was disproportionate and unsupported by credible evidence. The respondent had not produced original documents, medical evidence, or expert testimony to justify the magnitude of damages claimed.

The Bench reiterated that while the Code of Civil Procedure does not strictly govern consumer forum proceedings, compensation must still be determined on a rational, evidence-based assessment of loss and cannot rest on general observations alone.

The court modified the relief and reduced the compensation to Rs. 25 lakh, the amount already deposited by the appellant during the proceedings and released to the respondent.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
AAR Holds Semen Sorting Services for Bovine Breeding Exempt from GST Renting Building to Run Hotel Not Taxable as “Renting of Immovable Property Service”: CESTAT rules in matter of Rajinikanth Supreme Court Reduces Rs. 2 Crore NCDRC Compensation for bad haircut to Rs. 25 Lakh ITAT Deletes Rs. 56.15 Lakh Addition for Alleged Unexplained Property Investment High Court Upholds Rs. 3.90 Lakh Decree in Landlord-Tenant Commercial DisputeView All Posts