Supreme Court Reduces Rs. 2 Crore NCDRC Compensation for bad haircut to Rs. 25 Lakh:

Apex Court Modifies Award; Limits Payout to Amount Already Released to Complainant
Supreme Court Slashes Rs. 2 Crore Compensation in ITC Maurya Salon Case

Supreme Court Reduces Rs. 2 Crore NCDRC Compensation for bad haircut to Rs. 25 Lakh
The respondent, Aashna Roy, visited the beauty salon at the appellant’s ITC Maurya Hotel in New Delhi on April 12, 2018, for a haircut. Dissatisfied with the service, she filed a complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in July 2018, alleging deficiency in service and medical negligence.
The NCDRC, vide an order dated September 21, 2021, found the hotel guilty and awarded a staggering compensation of Rs. 2,00,00,000. After an initial round of litigation where the Supreme Court remitted the case back for fresh consideration, the NCDRC reaffirmed the Rs. 2 crore award on April 25, 2023. The appellant then moved the Supreme Court to challenge the quantum of this compensation.
Issue Before SC: Whether the NCDRC was justified in awarding a compensation of Rs. 2,00,00,000 for deficiency in service without a scientific or evidentiary assessment of the actual loss suffered by the respondent.
SC's Decision: The Supreme Court of India partly allowed the appeal and substantially reduced the compensation awarded by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
The Court held that although deficiency in service was established, the compensation awarded by the NCDRC was disproportionate and unsupported by credible evidence. The respondent had not produced original documents, medical evidence, or expert testimony to justify the magnitude of damages claimed.
The Bench reiterated that while the Code of Civil Procedure does not strictly govern consumer forum proceedings, compensation must still be determined on a rational, evidence-based assessment of loss and cannot rest on general observations alone.
The court modified the relief and reduced the compensation to Rs. 25 lakh, the amount already deposited by the appellant during the proceedings and released to the respondent.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








