A Single Consolidated Satisfaction Note Cannot Cover More Than One Assessment Year: ITAT:
The ITAT holds that Section 153C original assessment proceedings are invalid because they were based on a single consolidated satisfaction note covering multiple assessment years.
ITAT Delhi Quashes Section 263 Revision Order
Saloni Kumari
May 28, 2026Premium
A Single Consolidated Satisfaction Note Cannot Cover More Than One Assessment Year: ITAT
The ITAT holds that Section 153C original assessment proceedings are invalid because they were based on a single consolidated satisfaction note covering multiple assessment years.
Also Read
ITAT Restricts Section 69A Addition to Rs 3 Lakh ITAT Deletes Rs 3 Lakh Addition on Explained Cash Deposits, Allows Taxpayer's AppealITAT Rules No PE in India if Services are Rendered Entirely from Outside IndiaITAT Deletes Rs. 43.03 Lakh Tax Addition, Says AO Cannot Make Ad Hoc Disallowance of Purchases Without Specific Defects
About Author
Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2507My Recent Articles
- GSTN Puts Proposed e-Way Bill Enhancements on Hold; Existing Process Remains Unchanged
- ITAT Deletes Rs. 43.03 Lakh Tax Addition, Says AO Cannot Make Ad Hoc Disallowance of Purchases Without Specific DefectsPremium
- Complete Blindness and Health Issues Justify Fresh Opportunity in Rs 27.06 Lakh Tax Addition Case, Holds ITATPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 70 Lakh Penalty, Says Genuine ITR Clerical Error Is Not Misreporting of Income
- Who Needs to File ITR by July 31? Check Eligibility, Due Dates, and Extension Update
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts