Bombay HC Sets Aside Income Tax Show Cause Notices Issued u/s 148 to Firstcry:

Firstcry informs NSE and BSE that the Bombay High Court has set aside notices received by them from the Income Tax Department.
Bombay HC Quashes IT Notices Issued to Firstcry for Four Assessment Years

Bombay HC Sets Aside Income Tax Show Cause Notices Issued u/s 148 to Firstcry
On July 22, 2025, Firstcry informed the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) that the Bombay High Court has set aside notices received by them under clause (b) of section 148A of the Income Tax Act from the Income Tax Department for A.Y. 2018-19, A.Y. 2019-20, A.Y. 2020-21, and A.Y. 2021-22. The company discloses this information to the stock exchange under Regulation 30(7) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
This disclosure is in continuation of previous intimations dated August 23, 2024, and October 26, 2024. The company is informing that earlier it filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, challenging notices issued by the Income Tax Department. The company was issued these notices on October 25, 2024, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to make reassessment/re-computation under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Earlier, the court granted interim relief and stayed the reassessment proceedings under the Notices. Now, in the final hearing, the High Court has disposed of the matter by setting aside the notices on the grounds that the Income Tax Department issued those notices without jurisdiction and a judicial precedent in favour of the company existed (which is currently pending in appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court).
The High Court has announced its decision under Writ Petition Nos. 2948 of 2025, 2120 of 2025, 2138 of 2025, and 2125 of 2025. The company received the direction or order, including any ad interim or interim orders, or any other communication from the authority on July 21, 2025.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2450My Recent Articles
- ITAT Deletes Rs 12 Lakh Section 68 Addition After Assessee Proves Lender’s Identity, Creditworthiness and Genuine TransactionPremium
- ITAT Holds Approval Should Be Taken from PCCIT under Section 151(ii) When Section 148 Notice Is After 3-Year Time LimitPremium
- ITAT Sets Aside CIT(E)’s Rejection of Charitable Trust’s Section 12AB Registration and 80G Approval ApplicationsPremium
- ITAT Upholds Section 148 Reopening But Restricts Rs 30 Lakh Accommodation Entry Addition To 5%, Cites Double TaxationPremium
- Claiming Full TDS Credit Without Reporting Entire Income Is Underreporting, Not Misreporting: ITAT Premium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








