CA Penalized For Not Performing Auditing Duties Properly:

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Kolkata, has confirmed a penalty of Rs 1.5 lakhs on Chartered Accountant CA Vijay Bora of M/s Doogar & Associates for violating Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013.
ROC Imposes Penalty on CA u/s 143
Table of Contents

CA Penalised for Not Performing Auditing Duties Properly
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Kolkata, has confirmed a penalty of Rs 1.5 lakhs on Chartered Accountant CA Vijay Bora of M/s Doogar & Associates. The said penalty has been imposed as the CA violated Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013.
The auditor is directed to pay the penalty amount out of his own money within 90 days. If he does not deposit the penalty amount within this period, then he will have to face consequences as ROC can take action under section 454(8) (ii) of the Companies Act, 2013 against the auditor.
What is Section 143?
The ROC found that the auditor had failed to comply with some provisions of Section 143 of the Companies Act. Section 143 states the powers and duties of auditors in India, including reporting on financial statements and any fraud noticed during the course of the audit. The Registrar of Companies (ROC), West Bengal, issued an adjudication order on July 31, 2023, against CA Vijay Bora related to his audit work for M/s Maheep Marketing Pvt Ltd for the financial year 2014-15. The ROC issued a notice in January 2023, but CA Vijay Bora did not respond to it, due to which the ROC penalised him with Rs 1,50,000. The CA appealed the penalty, and the hearing was held on 5th May 2025 before the Regional Director (Eastern Region), Ministry of Corporate Affairs. However, after hearing the AR of the CA, no ground was made out to interfere with the order dated 31/07/2023. Therefore, the ROC confirmed this penalty. The penalty was imposed as follows:
The auditor is directed to pay the penalty amount out of his own money within 90 days. If he does not deposit the penalty amount within this period, then he will have to face consequences as ROC can take action under section 454(8) (ii) of the Companies Act, 2013 against the auditor.About Author

Nidhi
Content Writer
Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1833My Recent Articles
- Karnataka High Court Gives Another Chance in GST Matter Due to Lack of Hearing
- Delay Should Be Condoned if Explanation is Unrefuted: ITAT
- Non-Service of Income Tax Notice, Ill health of taxpayer, ITAT condones Appeal filing delay
- Books of Accounts Cannot be Rejected Without Any Specific Defect: ITAT Kolkata
- Karnataka High Court Sends ITC Matter Back to GST Authorities for Reconsideration
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








