ITAT Quashes Penalty as AO Failed to Validly Initiate Proceedings During Assessment:
The ITAT Chennai held mere observation that penalty 'Will be Initiated Separately' does not constitute valid satisfaction under Section 271(1)(c)
ITAT Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal
Saima
Aug 9, 2026
Premium
ITAT Quashes Penalty as AO Failed to Validly Initiate Proceedings During Assessment
The ITAT Chennai held mere observation that penalty 'Will be Initiated Separately' does not constitute valid satisfaction under Section 271(1)(c)
Also Read
Supreme Court Holds Job-Work Processing Not Liable to Textile Cess Under Section 5A3i Infotech Settles Rs 775.05 Crore Income Tax Disputes Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024IT Department Urges Select Taxpayers to Disclose Undeclared Overseas Assets Under FAST-DSFormer Employee Secures Major Relief: ITAT Allows Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS 2019 Compensation
About Author
Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
588My Recent Articles
- Supreme Court Remands GST Fraud Accused’s Bail Plea for Fresh Hearing Over Suppression of Material Facts
- GSTAT Allows Singapore Airlines’ Rs 45.92 Lakh GST Refund on Cancelled COVID-Era Tickets
- High Court Dismisses GST Department’s Appeals as Not Maintainable for Breaching Monetary Limits
- Supreme Court Holds Job-Work Processing Not Liable to Textile Cess Under Section 5A
- GSTAT Holds Route Deviation Alone Cannot Prove Tax Evasion
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts