Calcutta High Court Denies Relief to West Bengal Excise Officer in Bribery Case

During the operation, the petitioner's handwash samples were collected, and a forensic report confirmed the presence of phenolphthalein and sodium carbonate.

High Court Denies Relief to Officer in Liquor License Bribe Case

Nidhi | Mar 23, 2026 |

Calcutta High Court Denies Relief to West Bengal Excise Officer in Bribery Case

Calcutta High Court Denies Relief to West Bengal Excise Officer in Bribery Case

The Calcutta High Court has refused to give relief to a West Bengal excise officer accused of accepting bribery for facilitating the opening of a liquor shop outside his jurisdiction. The court observed that the corrupt officials know how to get their work done even beyond their jurisdiction.

The excise officer, Sandip Kumar Roy, was accused of asking for a bribe of Rs 1 lakh as part of a bigger Rs 16 lakh demand. In return, he allegedly promised to help the other person that he would help him get a liquor license. The officer has requested the court to quash the criminal case against him, but the court did not agree.

He was arrested on November 26, 2016, by the anti-corruption branch, followed by a written complaint that alleged that he had demanded Rs 1 lakh as a bribe for facilitating a bar-cum-restaurant license, which is beyond his territorial jurisdiction. After this, a case was registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Justice Apurba Sinha Ray said that corrupt officials pretend they have the ability to facilitate the opening of liquor shops even outside their jurisdiction. So, the officer’s claim that he could not help with a license outside his jurisdiction was not convincing.

The case is based on a trap operation by the Anti-Corruption Branch. During this operation, the petitioner’s handwash samples were collected, and a forensic report confirmed the presence of phenolphthalein and sodium carbonate. This showed that he has managed the tainted currency notes.

The officer argued that the tainted money was found on the sofa and was not found in his possession. His advocate argued that the prosecution case was flawed, as there was no proof of demand or acceptance of a bribe.

However, the court noted that the chemical test showed he touched the money. A witness also supported the claim that a bribe was demanded.

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
CBDT Approves Tea Research Association as Research Association for Income Tax Benefit Purposes Company Law Big Breaking: Government Moves Corporate Laws Amendment Bill, No Audit required for Certain classes of companies Calcutta High Court Denies Relief to West Bengal Excise Officer in Bribery Case Uttarakhand GST Investigation Dept: Officials Pose as Buyers to Expose Tax Evasion Worth Over Rs 150 Crore How Indians Are Choosing Personal Loans in 2026 View All Posts