CBI Files 18th Chargesheet Against MKHS Housing, Indiabulls Entities in Homebuyers Major Fraud Case:

CBI has filed its 18th chargesheet against MKHS Housing LLP, Indiabulls entities and their directors/officials over alleged cheating, criminal conspiracy and fund diversion in a Rajarhat homebuyers fraud case.
CBI Intensifies Homebuyers Fraud Probe

In connection with a recent ongoing probe in a large-scale homebuyer fraud case, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has filed the 18th chargesheet against M/s. MKHS Housing LLP, its designated partner, M/s. Indiabulls Distribution Services Limited (at present known as M/s. Indiabulls Nests Limited), and its directors/officials, as well as M/s. Indiabulls Investment Advisors Limited (at present known as M/s. Indiabulls Urban Residency Limited), and its directors in relation to alleged fraudulent activities concerning a housing project located at Rajarhat Town Area, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal.
According to the reports, the charge sheets have been filed before the CBI (Special) Court-II, Alipore, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal. The probe conducted by the CBI unveiled that the accused allegedly conspired with officials of an NBFC and induced homebuyers and investors through false promises and misleading representations to obtain financial benefits through illegal means.
The CBI stated that its investigation uncovered substantial evidence supporting allegations of criminal conspiracy, abetment, cheating, and criminal breach of trust under relevant provisions of the Indian Penal Code.
The agency is currently investigating 31 other cases registered following directions of the Supreme Court. These cases involve allegations of cheating and diversion of funds by various builder companies, along with suspected involvement of officials of financial institutions.
Before this latest filing, the CBI had filed 17 charge sheets against several builder companies, including Rudra Buildwell Constructions, Jaypee Infratech, AVJ Developers, CHD Developers, Logix City Developers, Ninex Developers, and others, along with their directors and officials of certain banks and financial institutions.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2637My Recent Articles
- Section 23(5) Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Unsold Flats: ITAT Deletes Rs 31.56 Lakh Deemed Rent AdditionPremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 263 Revision, Holds Explained Purchase Difference Cannot Make Assessment Prejudicial to RevenuePremium
- TDS Deposited Later Cannot Remain a Principal Liability Under Section 201(1): ITAT Remands Rs. 6.67 Lakh TDS DisputePremium
- Technical AI Courses vs Non-Tech AI Courses in Mumbai: Which Fits a Non-Coding Background?
- Bland Statement Alleging Fraud or Concealment of Facts Not Enough to Invoke Section 74 Extended Limitation: SCPremium
Loading suggestions…







