CLASS ACTION SUIT UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2013

CLASS ACTION SUIT UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2013 Section 245 brought in force from June 1, 2016 vide Ministry of Corporate Affairs notification n

CLASS ACTION SUIT UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2013
Section 245 brought in force from June 1, 2016 vide Ministry of Corporate Affairs notification number S.O. 1934(E).
Class Action Suit became reality for Indian investor(s)/depositor(s) under new Companies Act, 2013 which is also known as Representative Suit. This kind of lawsuit is very popular in countries like USA, UK, Singapore, Canada, Austria and other European countries.
Class Action Suit gained momentum with the case of Satyam, where the financials of the Company were manipulated for number of years and the Indian investors drown their hard earn money in the market due to fraud my companys promoter. The noteworthy point was that the American depositors of Satyam were able to receive $125 million in settlement because of strong framework of class action in USA.
Class Action Suit is still on black white, but any member(s)/depositor(s) or any class of them fulfilling the requisite number as per Section 245(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 can file a Class Action Suit against:
- A Company or its directors for any fraudulent, unlawful or wrongful act or omission or any likely act or omission or conduct on its or their part;
- An auditor including audit firm for any improper or misleading statement of particulars made in their audit report or for any fraudulent, unlawful or wrongful act or conduct;
- An expert or advisor or consultant or any other person associated with the company for any incorrect or misleading statement made to the company or for any fraudulent, unlawful or wrongful act or conduct or any likely act or conduct on their part.
- An application or petition under Section 245(1) be filed in Form NCLT-9 as per rule 84 of NCLT Rules, 2016;
- A copy of application also needs to be serve to the Company, Regional Director, Registrar of Companies, others respondents and all such persons as the Tribunal may direct;
- The Tribunal after taking into account the points as mentioned in Section 245(4) and rule 85 of NCLT Rules, 2016, may admit or dismiss the application;
- On admission of application, a public notice shall be issued by the Tribunal in Form NCLT-13 to all the members of the class as per Section 245(5) and rule 87 of NCLT Rules, 2016;
- In case any applicant wants to opt-out of the proceedings after the institution of suit, applicant may do so with the permission of Tribunal by filing Form NCLT-1 as per rule 86 of NCLT Rules, 2016;
- Relief that can be sought in a Class Action Suit under Section 245(1) are:
- Restrain the company from committing an act which is ultra vires;
- Restrain the company from committing breach of any provisions of the memorandum or articles of association;
- Invalidating resolutions if the resolution was passed by suppression of material facts or was obtained by making misstatement;
- Restrain the company and its directors from acting on such resolutions;
- Restrain the company from doing an act which is contrary to the provisions of this Act or any other law for the time being in force;
- Claim damages or compensation or demand suitable action from parties involved; and
- Any other remedy as the Tribunal may deem fit.
About Author

CA Deepak Gupta
Co Founder
CA Deepak Gupta,is Co-founder of Studycafe. He is Microsoft Office Specialist and Corporate Trainer of AI Tools, Microsoft Excel.
He is Finance Influencer having more than 250K followers on Social Media. CA Deepak Gupta, is Having more than 14 plus years of experience, and he has Worked with best brands Like, Hero, Wipro, Ericsson before Starting Studycafe. He has Trained more than 20000 Persons in Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint, Power BI, Google Sheet, Google Forms and Other Tools.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
3423My Recent Articles
- UltraTech Cement slapped with Rs. 808.78 Cr Income Tax Demand
- GST: High Court upheld constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c), asks government to address ITC issues of genuine purchasers
- Old vs New Tax Regime for Tax Year 2026-27
- High court criticizes Income Tax Department for not releasing ITR Utilities despite 11 years of directions
- Fino Payments Bank CEO Rishi Gupta Gets Bail in GST Case, Bank Clarifies No Direct Link
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.







