Delay in Appointment of Company Secretary Costs Company and Directors Rs 8.8 lakh Penalty:

The MCA imposed a total penalty of Rs. 8.86 lakh on FirstMeridian Business Services Limited and two officers in default for failure to appoint a Company Secretary within the prescribed statutory period under the Companies Act, 2013.
Failure to Fill Vacancy Within Prescribed Period Invokes Section 203

Delay in Appointment of Company Secretary Costs Company and Directors Rs 8.8 lakh Penalty
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), through the Registrar of Companies (ROC) Mumbai, has penalized First Meridian Business Services Limited and its designated officers a total of Rs. 8.8 lakh. This statutory penalty was imposed because of a 144-day delay in filling the key managerial personnel vacancy of the Company Secretary, thereby directly violating the prescribed compliance period under Section 203(4) of the Companies Act, 2013.
On January 17, 2024, the previous Company Secretary Ms. Monali Joshi, resigned from her office and the statutory office fell vacant. According to the application of Section 203(4) of the Act, the Company was under an obligation to fill this statutory vacancy through a Board meeting within a maximum period of 6 months from the date of the offce being vacant. The Company after a delay of 144 days, appointed Mr Girish Kumar to the position.
The company, along with its whole-time Director and CEO and Chief Financial Officer, filed a suo motu adjudication application before the Registrar of Companies (ROC) under Section 454 of the Act admitting the default. The Adjudicating Officer observed that the company had clearly violated Section 203 by failing to comply with the maximum time period to fill the vacancy.
Accordingly, the Registrar of Companies (ROC) exercised the powers under Section 454 of the Companies Act and imposed a penalty of Rs 5 lakh on the company. Further, penalties of Rs 1.93 lakh each were imposed on Mr Srinivasan Satish and Mr Sudhakar Balakrishnan, which included Rs 50,000 for the initial default and Rs 1,000 per day for 143 days of continuing default under Section 203(5) of the Act.
The Registrar has directed the noticees to pay the penalty within 90 days through the MCA e-adjudication portal and clarified that the penalties imposed on the officers in default must be paid from their personal sources or income.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2612My Recent Articles
- ROC Penalises Nidhi Company and Five Directors for Failure to Furnish PAN and Email IDs of Allottees in Form PAS-Premium
- SBI Revises Cash Withdrawal Charges on Basic Savings Bank Deposit Accounts; Effective from October 1
- Delhi High Court Allows SC and HC Judges to File or Revise ITR Under New Regime Without Listing Certain AllowancesPremium
- ROC Penalises Company and Directors for Not Mentioning DINs of Directors on AOC-4 Forms Balance SheetsPremium
- Substantial Justice Prevails Over Technicalities: ITAT Condones 171-Day Delay in Section 54 Exemption Dispute Due to Ill HealthPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







