Delhi HC : IT Software should have been tested prior in time on a sufficiently large sample base of assessees before it is launched for public at large

Delhi HC : IT Software should have been tested prior in time on a sufficiently large sample base of assessees before it is launched for public at lar…

Delhi HC : IT Software should have been tested prior in time on a sufficiently large sample base of assessees before it is launched for public at large
In Krishan Agarwal Vs. PCIT [W.P.(C) 3459/2021 & C.M.No.10489/2021, W.P.(C) 8371/2021& C.M.No.25917/2021, W.P.(C) 5513/2021, W.P.(C) 5583/2021 & CM APPL. 17357/2021 dated August 27, 2021], the Hon’ble Delhi High Court vide Order 3459/ 2021 and 8371/2021 had observed that technology should be used to ease and facilitate transactions and not become a basis for harassing an assessee by asking him to repeatedly file unnecessary and irrelevant forms. It directed the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems) (“DGIT (Systems)”) to modify the software of filing returns accordingly.
In pursuance of the above-mentioned orders, DGIT(Systems) joined the proceedings in the current listed order wherein the Hon’ble Delhi High Court heard petitions while taking into account the contention put forth by DGIT (Systems) which pleaded that it is making the best effort to resolve the software issues flagged in the impugned orders. Added that the Assessing Officer (“the AO”) books a ticket in the occurrence of issues raised in the computer programme or software which is then either resolved or sent to another vertical.
The Hon’ble Delhi High Court thereby observed that the public at large should only be asked to use the software after it has been “tested prior in time on a sufficiently large sample base of assessees”. Programme should be made flexible enough to incorporate the implementation of the Court's orders.
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.
About Author

A2ZBimal Jain
Chartered Accountant
CA Bimal Jain is a Member of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India since May 1994 and Member of Institute of Company Secretaries of India since December 2006 along with a Bachelors degree in Law. Also, he is a Qualified SAP - FI/CO Consultant and has more than 21 years of experience in Indirect Taxation and specializes in all aspects of Service Tax, Value Added Tax (VAT)/ Central Sales Tax (CST), Central Excise, Customs, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Special Economic Zone (SEZ), Export Oriented Unit (EOU), Export-Import Laws and well acquainted with the concept and impact of way forward Goods and Services tax (GST).
A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Delhi, Delhi, India
468My Recent Articles
- Actions taken by the department during enquiry need not necessarily be termed as harassment
- Who are liable to generate e-invoice w.e.f October 1, 2022
- Personal penalty cannot be imposed on the Chairman of the Company for failure in ensuring proper accounting of the goods
- Stayed the order of cancellation of GST Registration of the assessee for continuing the trading activities
- Can CA be arrested- Section 69 vs Section 132 of the CGST Act
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








