Delhi HC set aside the order passed by the Assessing Officer as no personal hearing was granted to the assessee

  • Home
  • Delhi HC set aside the order passed by the Assessing Officer as no personal hearing was granted to the assessee

CA Bimal Jain | Jul 31, 2021 | Views 495279

Delhi HC set aside the order passed by the Assessing Officer as no personal hearing was granted to the assessee

Delhi HC set aside the order passed by the Assessing Officer as no personal hearing was granted to the assessee

In Naresh Kumar Goyal v. National Faceless Assessment Centre &; Ors. [ W.P.(C) 6245/2021 &; CM APPLs. 19753-54/2021 decided on July 12, 2021], Naresh Kumar Goyal (“the Petitioner”) challenged the show cause notice and the draft assessment order both dated April 19, 2021, penalty notice dated May 20, 2021 (“the Notices”) and the assessment order dated May 20, 2021 (“the Impugned Order”) passed by the Department.

The Petitioner contended that, the Impugned Order and the Notices have been passed without granting an opportunity for personal hearing and thus, are in gross violation of principles of natural justice.

The Petitioner further contended that the Respondent rejected the request of the Petitioner for personal hearing merely because such request was not made by the Petitioner through the link provided by the Department in SCN. However, no such linkand manner was prescribed in the SCN.

The Department contended that there is no vested right in the Petitioner to claim personal hearing as the expression used in clause (vii) of sub-section (7) of Section 144B of the Income tax Act, 1961 (“IT Act”) is ‘may’ and not ‘shall’.

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court analyzed Section 144B(7) of the IT Act and relied on Sanjay Aggarwal v. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi [W.P. (C) 5741/2021 dated June 2, 2021] to state that personal hearing is to be provided. Further, set aside the Impugned Order and the Notices and remanded back the matter to the Assessing officerto pass the order after providing opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Join Studycafe's What's App Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio

My Recent Articles

Single Bench Order w.r.t Exemption provided to contribution upto Rs. 7,500/- PM to RWA under challenge before DB CESTAT: Burden of proof lies on Revenue w.r.t. intention of assesse to evade Excise Duty Service Tax not leviable on discounts offered by car manufacturers to their dealers for onward transmission to corporate customers Transfer of Development Rights under JDA taxable on value of similar flats offered to independent buyers ITC should be allowable on Invoices not furnished in FORM GSTR-1 by Suppliers View All Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement
Advertisement Banner 2

Studycafe Articles

Submit your Articles with us by Clicking Submit Article Button

Submit Article

you can also submit your articles by sending mail at [email protected]

Studycafe Articles

Submit your Articles with us by Clicking Submit Article Button

Submit Article

you can also submit your articles by sending mail at [email protected]