Directed CBDT to dispose the representation w.r.t. TDS on e-commerce transactions within 6 months

  • Home
  • Directed CBDT to dispose the representation w.r.t. TDS on e-commerce transactions within 6 months

CA Bimal Jain | Sep 22, 2021 | Views 235037

Directed CBDT to dispose the representation w.r.t. TDS on e-commerce transactions within 6 months

Directed CBDT to dispose the representation w.r.t. TDS on e-commerce transactions within 6 months

In MJunction Services Ltd. and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. [WPO/441/2021 dated August 25, 2021], MJunction Services Ltd. (‘the Petitioner”) filed a writ petition being aggrieved by the new provision of Section 194 – O of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the IT Act“) that took effect from October 1, 2020.

The Petitioner was aggrieved by the fact that Section 194 – O of the IT Act cast an obligation on the part of the Petitioner to deduct and deposit Tax Deducted at Source (“TDS”) on account sale consideration received from e-commerce participant, customers and buyers. The Petitioner sought relief of declaration on the same.

The Petitioner is also aggrieved by inaction on the part of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (“CBDT”) (“the Respondent No. 8”) and sitting over and not disposing the representations of the Petitioner for redressal of its grievances in this regard, made under Section 194 – O (4) of the IT Act.

In the case, the Respondents were unable to justify the inaction on the part of the Respondent No. 8 which is causing great difficulties to the Petitioner in carrying on its business.

Taking perusal of all the facts and evidences, the Honorable Calcutta High Court directed Respondent No. 8 to dispose of the aforementioned representations made by the Petitioner within a period of 6 months. Furthermore, the Court added that the Petitioner shall go on depositing the TDS in question but there shall be no penalty imposed on him by Respondent No. 8. The Court, therefore, granted an interim relief to the Petitioner with a liberty to seek appropriate relief in the said case.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.

Join Studycafe's What's App Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio

My Recent Articles

Guidelines on grant of bail to accused not arrested during investigation post filing of Chargesheet Irrecoverable loss incurred due to bad weather and technical snags would be considered as Revenue Loss SEZ falls within the meaning of ‘any person’ as given under Section 54 of the CGST Act and shall be entitled to refund Best Judgment Assessment Order withdrawn as Petitioner filed relevant returns in accordance with order of High Court Quashed registration cancellation order of GSTN and directed Department to consider the case afresh View All Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *