Disciplinary Proceedings Closed Against Chartered Accountant In Rs. 42 Crore Bank Fraud Case:

Committee held CA not guilty in a Rs. 42 crore bank fraud matter after CBI failed to prove that he signed two different balance sheets submitted to a bank and ROC.
ICAI Clears CA in Rs. 42 Crore Bank Fraud Case for Lack of Evidence

Disciplinary Proceedings Closed Against Chartered Accountant In Rs. 42 Crore Bank Fraud Case
The Central Bureau of Investigation initiated a complaint against CA Jani Basha K regarding a reported Rs. 42.17 crore bank fraud linked to M/s Pavai Alloys & Steel Pvt. Ltd. According to the Indian Bank’s report, the CBI claimed the Chartered Accountant endorsed two conflicting balance sheets for the 2006-07 fiscal year. One version was officially filed with the Registrar of Companies, while a second version allegedly featuring inflated financials was used to secure bank credit.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) found a prima facie case of professional misconduct, moving the inquiry to its Disciplinary Committee. The respondent countered these claims, maintaining he only signed the audited statements uploaded to the MCA portal. He distanced himself from any manipulated documents that may have been presented to the lending institution.
Central Issue: The central question was whether the Chartered Accountant committed professional misconduct by purportedly certifying two distinct sets of financial records—one for the ROC and another, more favorable version, for banking purposes.
Tribunal's Ruling: The ICAI Disciplinary Committee cleared the respondent of all charges and terminated the case. The Committee highlighted a significant evidentiary gap that the complainant provided only photocopies rather than original versions of the disputed second balance sheet. Also, no forensic analysis or handwriting expertise was introduced to verify the signatures as those of the respondent. With witness testimonies also failing to bridge this gap, the evidence remained circumstantial.
The Committee extended the benefit of the doubt to the respondent as the complainant failed to meet the necessary burden of proof, concluding there was no verified link between him and the fraudulent filings.
To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2220My Recent Articles
- ITAT: Carbon Credit Receipts Are Capital, Not Taxable Under Income TaxPremium
- Gujarat HC Quashes Section 148 Notice After Reassessment Proceedings Were DroppedPremium
- High Court Denies GST Refund After Delayed Tribunal Appeal Beyond Section 112 TimelinePremium
- ITAT Allows Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS Compensation Despite Return OmissionPremium
- High Court Refuses Interference in Anti-Dumping Duty Matter Due to Alternative RemedyPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…









