Fair Hearing Mandatory Before GST Refund Denial, Rules Punjab and Haryana HC:

The HC held that GST refunds cannot be rejected without issuing a proper SCN and granting taxpayers a fair opportunity of hearing under Rule 92(3) of the CGST Rules 2017.
GST Refund Cancellation Set Aside for Breach of Rule 92(3)

Fair Hearing Mandatory Before GST Refund Denial, Rules Punjab and Haryana HC
The Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed an order that had cancelled the GST refund for taxpayers, citing a breach of the principles of natural justice and Rule 92(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The court held that the tax authorities are obliged to grant a fair opportunity of hearing before cancelling any GST refund.
In the present case, M/s Creatif Design (petitioner) had contested ten orders cumulatively that had denied its GST refund. The petitioner argued that the tax authorities had issued the impugned orders without granting a fair opportunity of hearing, which is a clear violation of the principles of natural justice. Furthermore, the two rejection orders dated June 07, 2024, and September 05, 2024, were issued without issuing any prior show cause notice (SCN).
When the high court analysed the facts of the case, it noted that, as per the provisions of Rule 92(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, the tax authorities are mandated to grant a concerned taxpayer a fair opportunity of hearing before rejecting any application for a GST refund. However, in the present case, the tax authorities had violated the same provision. Hence, it is not just a contravention of the principles of natural justice but also of the provision of Rule 92(3) of the 2017 Rules.
In conclusion, the high court quashed the impugned order cancelling the petitioner's GST refund. However, the tax authorities are permitted to proceed further in the case.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2472My Recent Articles
- High Court Holds Assessment Reopening Based On Mere Change Of Opinion and Lacked Fresh Tangible MaterialPremium
- HC Rules Income Tax Reopening Illegal Without Fresh Tangible Material and Based on Mere Opinion ChangePremium
- No Fair Opportunity Given? ITAT Sends Rs 1.27 Crore Tax Addition Dispute Back for Fresh ConsiderationPremium
- High Court Directs GST Appellate Authority for Merits Hearing In Rs 12.34 Crore Tax Dispute; Extends Time To File AppealPremium
- High Court Grants Regular Bail to Director in Rs 63.21 Crore GST Fake Invoice and ITC Fraud CasePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








