Fresh Section 148A(b) Notice Without Supplying Material Held Unsustainable by Gujarat HC:

Reassessment proceedings vitiated for breach of prior court directions and principles of natural justice
Reassessment proceedings vitiated for breach of prior court directions and principles of natural justice

Fresh Section 148A(b) Notice Without Supplying Material Held Unsustainable by Gujarat HC
Champion Exim Co. was subjected to reassessment proceedings for AY 2018-19, which were earlier quashed by the Gujarat High Court in Special Civil Application No. 7429 of 2022, with a specific direction to the Assessing Officer to continue proceedings from the stage of Section 148A(b) after granting an opportunity to reply. Instead of proceeding from the directed stage, the department issued a fresh notice under Section 148A(b) on 14.08.2025 and thereafter passed an order dated 12.09.2025 under Section 148A(d), followed by a notice under Section 148.
The petitioner sought disclosure of crucial material relied upon by the department, including investigation inputs, sanction under Section 151, and evidence linking the petitioner to the challenged consignment. But there was no material provided. Aggrieved by the fresh notices and orders passed without furnishing the related material, the petitioner approached the High Court.
Main Issue: Whether reassessment proceedings initiated by issuing a fresh notice under Section 148A(b), contrary to earlier High Court directions and without supplying relied-upon material to the assessee, are sustainable in law.
HC Decided: The Gujarat High Court held that the Assessing Officer acted contrary to the earlier directions issued by the Court by issuing a fresh notice under Section 148A(b) instead of continuing proceedings from the mandated stage. The Court further held that failure to supply the material relied upon for initiating reassessment amounted to a clear violation of the principles of natural justice. It was observed that reassessment proceedings premised on undisclosed material cannot be sustained.
Therefore, the impugned order under Section 148A(d) dated 12.09.2025 and the consequential notice under Section 148 were quashed. The respondents were directed to recommence proceedings strictly from the notice dated 19.03.2022 issued under Section 148A(b), supply all relevant material sought by the petitioner, and thereafter pass a fresh order in accordance with law within twelve weeks.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2191My Recent Articles
- ITAT Quashes Section 153C Assessments Without Incriminating Material For Completed YearsPremium
- High Court Upholds DGGI Arrest Despite Prior State GST InvestigationPremium
- ITAT Holds Section 263 Assessment Cannot Survive After Revision Order Is QuashedPremium
- ITAT Allows Section 80P Deduction on Interest From Co-operative BanksPremium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition on Marriage Gift and Household Cash ExplanationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








